With two born individuals, life may trump liberty. But between a woman and a pre-viable fetus? Liberty trumps life. There's simply no other alternative.
You might consider that a hierarchy in which one trumps the other, but I believe it is a progression of thought.
Without Life, the others cannot exist.
Without Life and Liberty, the possibility of the Pursuit of Happiness is greatly diminished.
It appears that Roe has no qualms about eliminating the first two in the quest for the latter, at the expense of the first two for another party. (The word is Liberty, not Libertine).
Again - that's only with respect to the authority and power of the State. That's not a bar that applies to you. I urge you to persuade that single pregnant woman to do the right thing and give birth. Help her to decide, help her to address the money she lacks, her future that's at risk, and the partner that's abandoned her. It's not easy - but that's no excuse for demanding the government do the work for you.
I have done so in the past and will continue to do so. In view of the circumstances, I agreed with her decision to remain unwed and continue with the pregnancy, and she went into labor on my back steps.
The result was a wonderful great-granddaughter I love dearly.
The prospective husband and father was 'entangled' with an old flame even as the wedding plans were being finalized, and was caught thus,
in flagrante delicto. Needless to say, the wedding was cancelled, but the GGD was on the way.
Abortion was never really considered: Traditional Chippewa women value life, without which there can be nothing else.