DOJ Won't Release Top Secret Loretta Lynch Intercepts Suggesting Secret Deal To Rig Clinton Probe

[Free Vulcan]

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is refusing to release intercepted material alleging that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch conspired with the Clinton campaign in a deal to rig the Clinton email investigation, reports Paul Sperry of RealClear Investigations.

The information remains so secret that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz had to censor it from his recently released 500-plus-page report on the FBI’s investigation of Clinton, and even withhold it from Congress.

Not even members of Congress with top secret security clearance have been allowed to see the unverified accounts intercepted from presumed Russian sources in which the head of the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, allegedly implicates the Clinton campaign and Lynch in the scheme.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-26/doj-wont-release-top-secret-loretta-lynch-intercepts-suggesting-secret-deal-rig

[IsailedawayfromFR]

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is refusing to release intercepted material alleging that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch conspired with the Clinton campaign in a deal to rig the Clinton email investigation, reports Paul Sperry of RealClear Investigations.

The information remains so secret that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz had to censor it from his recently released 500-plus-page report on the FBI’s investigation of Clinton, and even withhold it from Congress.

Not even members of Congress with top secret security clearance have been allowed to see the unverified accounts intercepted from presumed Russian sources in which the head of the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, allegedly implicates the Clinton campaign and Lynch in the scheme.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-06-26/doj-wont-release-top-secret-loretta-lynch-intercepts-suggesting-secret-deal-rig

There is no defense in not allowing duly-elected representatives of our country to view information collected by non-elected bureaucrats.

[Bigun]

There is no defense in not allowing duly-elected representatives of our country to view information collected by non-elected bureaucrats.

None what so ever.

[Sanguine]

I want to know what they said. 

[truth_seeker]

We seem to be in a very critical time, in our nation's history.

Leftists threatening the lives of a double amputee veteran congressman's. children.


DOJ?FBI covering up misdeeds of previous administration probably to the President himself.
en't Russian collusion, is Sessions recused?
altered FBI 302s. nd refusing to turn over evidence to the co=equal branch, Congress.

Question: Since the Clinton emails, Lynch material,  aren't Russia related, is Session recused?

[DCPatriot]

None what so ever.

What do you think is in those files?  Especially when those Pakistani brothers got involved?

Or, do you think the Clintons have sooooo much sh*t on everybody?  That makes the most sense.

Those guys got carte blanche access in many members' offices.

IMO, it is Bubba/Hillary's 500 FBI files....cubed, not squared.  And she was freaking SOS on top of that.

No wonder she's walking around free.

Stupid bastards don't know that all the dirt about them won't be erased upon Bubba's or Hillary's demise.

Instead it will be a middle finger from the grave.

[Oceander]

So why isn’t Dear Leader insisting these things be released, at least to Congresspersons with clearance?

[DCPatriot]

So why isn’t Dear Leader insisting these things be released, at least to Congresspersons with clearance?

Good morning, smartguy!

Because people such as Jim Comey, John Brennan, Rothstein, Wray and Strzok have/had "clearance".

500 FBI files like back in the 90's?   That's bush league compared to what information/dirt she has on virtually everybody on Capitol Hill, using the Awan brothers together with Wasserman Schultz.

That's the SOLE reason that Hillary walks around free.  She has Washington DC scared shitless.

[Sanguine]

So why isn’t Dear Leader insisting these things be released, at least to Congresspersons with clearance?

I've wondered that too.

[Bigun]

So why isn’t Dear Leader insisting these things be released, at least to Congresspersons with clearance?

If we are ever to get to the bottom of this he is going to have to do exactly that IMHO.

[truth_seeker]

So why isn’t Dear Leader insisting these things be released, at least to Congresspersons with clearance?

Great question. Don't you think Potus has tread somewhat lightly, lest his detractors claim he is interfering with their permanent investigation(S) ?

Apparently to Sessions, he is recused regarding any subject with an "R" or "U" or "S" or "I" or "A" in any word describing the topic.
e McCain, Flake, Collins etc. would refuse seating a new AG, Assistant AG, FBI Director etc.
And enough Republican Senators, like

Finally Trump can read history, whereby Nixon brought the final curtain down in part, by ordering the firing of investigators.

Finally I think Trump can weigh the GOOD progress with his agenda, versus halting same by making the investigations the issue.

[Oceander]

Great question. Don't you think Potus has tread somewhat lightly, lest his detractors claim he is interfering with their permanent investigation(S) ?

Apparently to Sessions, he is recused regarding any subject with an "R" or "U" or "S" or "I" or "A" in any word describing the topic.
e McCain, Flake, Collins etc. would refuse seating a new AG, Assistant AG, FBI Director etc.
And enough Republican Senators, like

Finally Trump can read history, whereby Nixon brought the final curtain down in part, by ordering the firing of investigators.

Finally I think Trump can weigh the GOOD progress with his agenda, versus halting same by making the investigations the issue.

Ever ready with the lame excuse to justify Dear Leader’s failings.