I told you more than once - take a look at the Masterpiece Cakeshop website.
I have. Several times.
The gallery of items for sale
No, the gallery is of items already created and sold. Seriously, do you really expect some mom-and-pop baker to make wedding cakes in advance and store them in a cooler just hoping that someone walks in and buys it for a wedding taking place at that time? Think, man. Would a baker really invest that substantial amount of time and money to create something that would most likely spoil because people who have weddings plan ahead and order their cakes weeks in advance?
Good luck in finding someone whose last name starts with the letter 'P' and who needs a wedding cake tomorrow. Maybe then you can unload this "off-the-shelf" cake for some buyer? LMAO
And THIS is why you can't produce the evidence that backs up your claim. It is because your claim is asinine to begin with. But hey, it fits your narrative, which is why you even now continue to cling to it. You clearly do not care how dishonest and stupid it makes you look.
These are non-custom designs, as per the website.
Still waiting on that link. Because the Masterpiece Bakery website says no such thing. You made it up.
Where we disagree is the record before the Court. You apparently believe that Phillips would have provided a non-custom wedding cake to his gay customers.
If it was a gay man marrying a gay woman, then yes. But of course that has nothing at all with what the court documents say. They are clear. The baker offered to bake any other cake for the customers. But he does not make wedding cakes for same-sex weddings. If you are the lawyer you claim to be, then you should have zero problem understanding the wording of the ruling. But I suspect that you really aren't interested in truth here, but are only interested in pushing an agenda, and will tell any lie you can come up with to support it.
And as for your insinuation about my integrity -
Your posts speak for themselves.