Author Topic: In Politicized Justice, Desperate Times Call for Disparate Measures  (Read 510 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
National Review
Andrew C. McCarthy
May 19, 2018

FBI director Comey and the Obama Justice Department applied a double standard in their handling of the Clinton-email and Trump–Russia investigations.

We wuz robbed. That’s the theme Democrats and their media allies are working hard to cement into conventional wisdom. And robbed in a very specific way: The 2016 presidential election, we’re to believe, was stolen from Hillary Clinton by disparate treatment. As Democrats tell it, the FBI scandalized their candidate while protecting Donald Trump.

You might think peddling that story with a straight face would be a major challenge. But they figure it may work because it was test-driven by the FBI’s then-director, James Comey, in his now infamous press conference on July 5, 2016 — back when the law-enforcement and intelligence apparatus on which we rely to read the security tea leaves was simply certain that Mrs. Clinton would win.

If you or I had set up an unauthorized private communications system for official business for the patent purpose of defeating federal record-keeping and disclosure laws; if we had retained and transmitted thousands of classified emails on this non-secure system; if we had destroyed tens of thousands of government records; if we had carried out that destruction while those records were under subpoena; if we had lied to the FBI in our interview — well, we’d be writing this column from the federal penitentiary in Leavenworth. Yet, in a feat of dizzying ratiocination, Director Comey explained that to prosecute Mrs. Clinton would be to hold her to a nitpicking, selective standard of justice not imposed on other Americans.

More... https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/clinton-email-trump-russia-probes-justice-department-double-standards/



Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113

It's good to see McCarthy coming out and saying it.

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
It's good to see McCarthy coming out and saying it.

It is, but it's also a "no s***" moment.

Offline aligncare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 25,916
  • Gender: Male
It is, but it's also a "no s***" moment.

Yes, to us. But, not to half the country that watches the alphabets and reads the paper of record. Doesn’t matter, though. Those idiots aren’t reading National Review anyway.

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
It is, but it's also a "no s***" moment.


McCarthy would be more careful than most to not make rash statements about the laws involved. That's why I'm pleased to see this.