Author Topic: ABC Analyst Wrongly Calls Iran Nuclear Deal a ‘Treaty,’ Says U.S. Is ‘In Violation’  (Read 730 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

ABC Analyst Wrongly Calls Iran Nuclear Deal a ‘Treaty,’ Says U.S. Is ‘In Violation’


BY: David Rutz   
May 14, 2018 10:54 am

ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd wrongly referred to the Iran nuclear deal as a "treaty" Sunday while bemoaning President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from the agreement and reimpose sanctions on Tehran.

Dowd, who calls himself a "proud independent," agreed with reporter Cecilia Vega's fretting on "This Week" about internal divisions within the Trump administration over getting out of the Obama-era accord, NewsBusters reported .

http://freebeacon.com/politics/abc-analyst-wrongly-calls-iran-nuclear-deal-treaty-says-u-s-violation/

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,746
ABC needs to announce a retraction for the inaccurate reporting by its employee.


a treaty is a legal agreement between countries and can only be enacted by 2/3 approval of the Senate, which Obama failed to do.

Instead, Obama simply enacted an executive agreement, a political deal, which has no legality whatsoever.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Is this Dowd related to Maureen Dowd?

Offline Maj. Bill Martin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,904
  • Gender: Male
  • I'll make Mincemeat out of 'em"
ABC needs to announce a retraction for the inaccurate reporting by its employee.


a treaty is a legal agreement between countries and can only be enacted by 2/3 approval of the Senate, which Obama failed to do.

Instead, Obama simply enacted an executive agreement, a political deal, which has no legality whatsoever.

Believe it or not, it isn't even an Executive Agreement.  Obama's own State Department said that was not even a signed document at all.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/iran-nuclear-deal-not-signed-document-not-binding/
« Last Edit: May 15, 2018, 05:57:15 pm by Maj. Bill Martin »

Offline Sanguine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,986
  • Gender: Female
  • Ex-member
Believe it or not, it isn't even an Executive Agreement.  Obama's own State Department said that was not even a signed document at all.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/iran-nuclear-deal-not-signed-document-not-binding/

In fact, it seems to be a bit of a figment.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
ABC needs to announce a retraction for the inaccurate reporting by its employee.


a treaty is a legal agreement between countries and can only be enacted by 2/3 approval of the Senate, which Obama failed to do.

Instead, Obama simply enacted an executive agreement, a political deal, which has no legality whatsoever.

In addition to that.... Iran never "signed onto or agreed" with the so-called 'deal'.  It's worthless, IOW.  But the leftists know that.  They're just LYING, per usual.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.