Author Topic: Sean Hannity Net Worth: Fox News Host Linked To Shell Companies That Bought $90 Million Worth of Pro  (Read 9337 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
   Sean would be proud of you Briefers that defend that low life with such passion.

Since I can't ping you.....(for some reason)....

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,313268.msg1664594.html#msg1664594

No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline edpc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,879
  • Gender: Male
  • Professional Misanthrope - Briefer and Boxer
No body gives a shit whether you like Sean or not. The problem is digging through a mans investments and trying to turn it into a scandal even though it is legal as hell and plenty of people do it.

It's Commie talking point bullshit of the first order, especially when the peanut gallery making an issue of this hasn't said word one about the Podestas funneling Russian money into the US and hiding it in an art collection.


Oh, please. Sean did not want to be identified as a client of Cohen, but he was, by Cohen’s lawyer. Sean himself made the point to say the majority of the advice was for real estate. Why wouldn’t he believe people would start looking into public records to see if it had any validity? He didn’t have to disclose the nature of the advice, but he did. Now, he can’t squawk about someone finding easily obtainable information.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2018, 05:05:33 pm by edpc »
I disagree.  Circle gets the square.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

Oh, please. Sean did not want to be identified as a client of Cohen, but he was, by Cohen’s lawyer. He made the point to say the majority of the advice was for real estate. Why wouldn’t he believe  people would start looking into public records to see if it had any validity? He didn’t have to disclose the nature of the advice, but he did. Now, he can’t squawk about someone finding easily obtainable information.

Yeah...but the difference is.... attempting to paint him as a crook due to that advice or those investments is dishonest.  And beneath anyone but a G-damned leftie, IMO.  Just sayin....
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline edpc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,879
  • Gender: Male
  • Professional Misanthrope - Briefer and Boxer
Yeah...but the difference is.... attempting to paint him as a crook due to that advice or those investments is dishonest.  And beneath anyone but a G-damned leftie, IMO.  Just sayin....


Fair enough, but who is doing that here?
I disagree.  Circle gets the square.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum

Fair enough, but who is doing that here?

The implication behind the article is that Hannity is dishonest, and possibly a crook and did something unethical, if not illegal.  It's a "gotcha" piece.

Do you deny that?  Really?
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline driftdiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,897
  • Gender: Male
  • I could eat it raw but why when I have fire
The implication behind the article is that Hannity is dishonest, and possibly a crook and did something unethical, if not illegal.  It's a "gotcha" piece.

Do you deny that?  Really?

Fools mock, tongues wag, babies cry and goats bleat.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
The implication behind the article is that Hannity is dishonest, and possibly a crook and did something unethical, if not illegal.  It's a "gotcha" piece.

Do you deny that?  Really?

The article is, but the members aren't. Just the opposite.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum


Lol!  Hey, mind if I steal/use that?

I'm into the halo effect.
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline driftdiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,897
  • Gender: Male
  • I could eat it raw but why when I have fire
The article is, but the members aren't. Just the opposite.

@AbaraXas
So when a member condemns Hannity for the loan or implies it was obtained illegally thats actually the member condemning the article?
Fools mock, tongues wag, babies cry and goats bleat.

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
@AbaraXas
So when a member condemns Hannity for the loan or implies it was obtained illegally thats actually the member condemning the article?

No one has done that in the comments on the article.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline driftdiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,897
  • Gender: Male
  • I could eat it raw but why when I have fire
No one has done that in the comments on the article.

Got any bridges for sale.

Fools mock, tongues wag, babies cry and goats bleat.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
@AbaraXas
So when a member condemns Hannity for the loan or implies it was obtained illegally thats actually the member condemning the article?

I said members - plural, as in membership as a whole. The implication was it was a widespread attack by membership. I'm not going to judge the whole group based on one statement by one person in the course of a conversation.

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Got any bridges for sale.


Got any certain comment you can show to back up your silly disruptive claim?
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Got any bridges for sale.



You supplying a link to the comment would be easier.

Offline driftdiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,897
  • Gender: Male
  • I could eat it raw but why when I have fire
I said members - plural, as in membership as a whole. The implication was it was a widespread attack by membership. I'm not going to judge the whole group based on one statement by one person in the course of a conversation.

@AbaraXas
Well if you're gonna argue the meaning of IS then I'm gonna have to call my attorney.
Fools mock, tongues wag, babies cry and goats bleat.

Offline driftdiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,897
  • Gender: Male
  • I could eat it raw but why when I have fire
You supplying a link to the comment would be easier.

@AbaraXas @txradioguy
Don't even bother responding to me.  Its obvious neither of you has an ounce of integrity.
Fools mock, tongues wag, babies cry and goats bleat.

Offline DCPatriot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,073
  • Gender: Male
  • "...and the winning number is...not yours!
A "Trust" sounds reliable and friendly. A "Shell Corp" sounds evil and mysterious. Of course no one here cares about that, or the fact that DNC muckity mucks owns his house in Georgetown.

Not Georgetown.....but the Kalorama neighborhood.   ^-^
"It aint what you don't know that kills you.  It's what you know that aint so!" ...Theodore Sturgeon

"Journalism is about covering the news.  With a pillow.  Until it stops moving."    - David Burge (Iowahawk)

"It was only a sunny smile, and little it cost in the giving, but like morning light it scattered the night and made the day worth living" F. Scott Fitzgerald

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
@AbaraXas @txradioguy
Don't even bother responding to me.  Its obvious neither of you has an ounce of integrity.

So you've got nothing...got it.  Should have just admitted that from the start.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Online corbe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,392
   No, I am not a communist and I don't harbor any ill feelings toward rich people PROVIDING they obtained their wealth within the confines of the law, it's the American Way.  With that being said by dislike for the 2 head Trump cheerleaders, Hannity and Rush, is off the scale. Reprobates both. Flame on.
No government in the 12,000 years of modern mankind history has led its people into anything but the history books with a simple lesson, don't let this happen to you.

Offline driftdiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,897
  • Gender: Male
  • I could eat it raw but why when I have fire
So you've got nothing...got it.  Should have just admitted that from the start.

@txradioguy
Aren't you the guy who thinks the Secretary of HUD signs off on all loans.

BWHAHAHAHAAAHHAAAAAAAA
Fools mock, tongues wag, babies cry and goats bleat.

Offline driftdiver

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,897
  • Gender: Male
  • I could eat it raw but why when I have fire
   No, I am not a communist and I don't harbor any ill feelings toward rich people PROVIDING they obtained their wealth within the confines of the law, it's the American Way.  With that being said by dislike for the 2 head Trump cheerleaders, Hannity and Rush, is off the scale. Reprobates both. Flame on.

@corbe
So what law did Hannity break?   Do you think he should have to prove his innocence?

Or is this simply a political hit job with the intent of forcing him off the air and silencing a conservative voice?

Inquiring minds want to know.
Fools mock, tongues wag, babies cry and goats bleat.

Offline XenaLee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15,398
  • Gender: Female
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
I said members - plural, as in membership as a whole. The implication was it was a widespread attack by membership. I'm not going to judge the whole group based on one statement by one person in the course of a conversation.

Um.... where did you get that.

My very first words were...

Quote
The implication behind the article ....

What the hell?
No quarter given to the enemy within...ever.

You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out of it.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
@AbaraXas @txradioguy
Don't even bother responding to me.  Its obvious neither of you has an ounce of integrity.

So you can't supply a citation for your accusation. Gotcha.

Offline ABX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
  • Words full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Um.... where did you get that.

My very first words were...

What the hell?

See as post by another member just above yours calling this place "Hannity Bashing Room" and attacking the membership.

Offline edpc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,879
  • Gender: Male
  • Professional Misanthrope - Briefer and Boxer
The implication behind the article is that Hannity is dishonest, and possibly a crook and did something unethical, if not illegal.  It's a "gotcha" piece.

Do you deny that?  Really?


My question was specific to the board commentary.
I disagree.  Circle gets the square.