Author Topic: Exceptional Work by Sharyl Attkisson – Did FBI Violate Woods Procedures?…  (Read 275 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline anubias

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,374
Exceptional Work by Sharyl Attkisson – Did FBI Violate Woods Procedures?…

Quote
To present a methaphor, under Title I FISA authority, Carter Page was essentially ‘patient zero’ in an Ebola pandemic.  Labeling him as a foreign agent allowed the FBI to look at every single person he came in contact with; and every single aspect of their lives and their activities in growing and concentric circles; without limits to current time or historic review.

The “Title I” designation as a foreign agent applied retroactively to any action taken by Mr. Page, and auto-generates an exponential list of other people he came in contact with.  Each of those people, groups or organizations could now have their communication reviewed, unmasked and analyzed by the DOJ/FBI with the same surveillance authority granted upon the target, Mr. Page.



Read more at

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/04/exceptional-work-by-sharyl-attkisson-did-fbi-violate-woods-procedures/

Offline edpc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,879
  • Gender: Male
  • Professional Misanthrope - Briefer and Boxer
One problem with the patient zero theory, though.  The Nunes memo was said to contain no factual errors, prior to release.  In that memo, it names Papadopoulos as the person that piqued interest to initiate the investigation.  The timeline in this 6 minute interview would suggest intel was monitoring his contacts and picked up chatter about him sometime in March 2016.  Unless the FBI went all the way back to the 2013 spy ring involvement with Page, it would seem ‘patient zero’ is actually Papadopoulos in this case.

http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/10/31/timeline-george-papadopoulos
I disagree.  Circle gets the square.