Flu vaccine BOMBSHELL: 630% more “aerosolized flu virus particles” emitted by people who received f

[rangerrebew]

Flu vaccine BOMBSHELL: 630% more “aerosolized flu virus particles” emitted by people who received flu shots… flu vaccines actually SPREAD the flu

Tuesday, January 30, 2018 by: Mike Adams   
 

(Natural News) A bombshell new scientific study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) finds that people who receive flu shots emit 630% more flu virus particles into the air, compared to non-vaccinated individuals. In effect, this finding documents evidence that flu vaccines spread the flu, and that so-called “herd immunity” is a medical hoax because “the herd” is actually transformed into carriers and spreaders of influenza.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-01-30-flu-vaccine-bombshell-630-more-aerosolized-flu-virus-particles-emitted-by-people-who-received-flu-shots-flu-vaccines-actually-spread-the-flu.html

[driftdiver]

oops

[Applewood]

Sorry, but I don't trust Natural News.  Actually, since this flu began, I can't trust other so-called "legitimate" sites either.  Seems to me most are hyping this flu and creating mass hysteria.  We don't need that now.

[WingNot]

Sorry, but I don't trust Natural News.  Actually, since this flu began, I can't trust other so-called "legitimate" sites either.  Seems to me most are hyping this flu and creating mass hysteria.  We don't need that now.

Naturalnews.com = Fake News. 

[Restored]

NaturalNews = Debka

[RoosGirl]

It's pretty easy to go look up the study that the article is about.

http://www.pnas.org/content/115/5/1081

[Applewood]

NaturalNews = Debka

Ok, I'm dumb.  What is Debka?

[DCPatriot]

Ok, I'm dumb.  What is Debka?

Believe "Debka" is an Israeli intelligence agency of sorts.

Their W-L record on predictions/events isn't even All-Star caliber.

[Applewood]

@DCPatriot

Thanks.  I always thought Israeli intelligence was top notch. 

[DCPatriot]

@DCPatriot

Thanks.  I always thought Israeli intelligence was top notch.

Meh....perhaps Debka is their farm team?   For a period, people laughed when they were the source link.

[the_doc]

Naturalnews.com = Fake News.

@Applewood
@Wingnut

I think you would do better to aim your cynicism at Big Pharma. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science is a generally reliable journal.  NaturalNews is merely citing the study.

Side Note:  The fact that PNAS actually dared to publish the study is auspicious, since academics ordinarily don't like to piss off the governmental entities or corporations that so often fund scientific studies.  Since the feds and Big Pharma are very, very pro-vaccination, the article is not going to be received well in the Halls of Power.   

[WingNot]

@Applewood
@Wingnut

I think you would do better to aim your cynicism at Big Pharma. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science is a generally reliable journal.  NaturalNews is merely citing the study.

Side Note:  The fact that PNAS actually dared to publish the study is auspicious, since academics ordinarily don't like to piss off the governmental entities or corporations that so often fund scientific studies.  Since the feds and Big Pharma are very, very pro-vaccination, the article is not going to be received well in the Halls of Power.

I'll aim allmy cynicism directly at NN.com and Mike Jones thank you very much.  It is a fake news site that preys on the weak minded. 

[the_doc]

I'll aim allmy cynicism directly at NN.com and Mike Jones thank you very much.  It is a fake news site that preys on the weak minded.

Oh, come on Wingnut.  You need to grasp the main point of my post: The PNAS is generally reliable.

Kudos to NaturalNews for citing the article.

Just sayin'.

[WingNot]

Oh, come on Wingnut.  You need to grasp the main point of my post: The PNAS is generally reliable.

Kudos to NaturalNews for citing the article.

Just sayin'.

With all due respect I don't give a rats ass about your main point.   Any kudo's to that Kook site is misplace rubish.

[Applewood]

@Applewood
@Wingnut

I think you would do better to aim your cynicism at Big Pharma. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Science is a generally reliable journal.  NaturalNews is merely citing the study.

Side Note:  The fact that PNAS actually dared to publish the study is auspicious, since academics ordinarily don't like to piss off the governmental entities or corporations that so often fund scientific studies.  Since the feds and Big Pharma are very, very pro-vaccination, the article is not going to be received well in the Halls of Power.

Big Pharma in some respects keeps me alive, so no, you won't hear me bad mouth them.  My only complaint about them is price gouging for certain meds.  The ones like that guy whose company raised the price of Epipen, -- he should have been shot.  If the pharmaceutical companies could make their products more reasonably priced and stop the collusion, I would be a happy camper.

[the_doc]

Big Pharma in some respects keeps me alive, so no, you won't hear me bad mouth them.  My only complaint about them is price gouging for certain meds.  The ones like that guy whose company raised the price of Epipen, -- he should have been shot.  If the pharmaceutical companies could make their products more reasonably priced and stop the collusion, I would be a happy camper.

I understand your position completely.  I just happen to be an M.D. who has noticed some pretty nasty stuff in Big Pharma over the past 20 years.  (If you'll pardon a segue into "conspiracy theory," I'm afraid that Big Pharma is an important part of the Deep State.)

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]