What happens when federal agencies accused of possible wrongdoing — also control the alleged evidence against them? What happens when they’re the ones in charge of who inside their agencies — or connected to them — ultimately gets investigated and possibly charged?
I'm sure we can rely on them to look at things in an unbiased manner. After all, didn't Kagan assure us she would do that when deciding on Obamacare, even though she had defended it in Court as the Solicitor General before she was appointed to SCOTUS?
Like that.