From all the sites I have read, I’m not sure where The Hill got its information. I tend to be leery of both The Hill and The Daily Wire, but I would like to believe they’re being above board here.
I see nothing that actually physically links HRC to Mark Lambert. Anybody else looking that actually sees a physical link? Supposedly, the FBI never notified State about the investigation leaving the key players in the dark, of course.
I’ve read some guy named William Douglas Campbell is the informant they reference.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-clinton-informant-exclusive/exclusive-secret-witness-in-senate-clinton-probe-is-ex-lobbyist-for-russian-firm-idUSKBN1DG1SBSome people who know Campbell are skeptical that he can shed much light on Uranium One. Two law enforcement officials with direct involvement in the Rosatom bribery case in which Campbell was an informant said they had no recollection or record of him mentioning the deal during their repeated interviews with him.
Also, although both Uranium One and the bribery cases involved Rosatom, the two cases involved different business units, executives and allegations, with little other apparent overlap, Reuters found in a review of the court records of the bribery case.
Campbell countered those who dismiss his knowledge of the Uranium One deal. “I have worked with the Justice Department undercover for several years, and documentation relating to Uranium One and political influence does exist and I have it,†Campbell said. He declined to give details of those documents.
Reuters was unable to learn when the closed-door testimony has been scheduled.
Maybe this is what the Hill is going on?
Honestly, hearing “endictmentâ€, “money laundering†and “Russia†in the same vein makes me nervous as we’ve heard those phrases used in the past with others, but the The Daily Wire does say it was Sessions and not Mueller making the indictments.
Hoping somebody can shed more light than I can get out of it.