Bombshell: Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook

[musiclady]

@musiclady

meh. I see this as a highly orchestrated con. And that position is largely defensible. That they called up a couple more bit players to bleed the deal is not surprising. They've lost the polls. All they can do is beat the dead horse.

This is why evidence is required.
Get enough tongues to waggin and there ain't many that won't go right down the garden path.
And that's what this is. I can smell it 10 miles away. Folks are getting played.

I'm not being played.
My tongue is not "waggin."

And I have no idea why you pinged me to a thread where I have not been involved.   

@roamer_1

[roamer_1]

I'm not being played.
My tongue is not "waggin."

And I have no idea why you pinged me to a thread where I have not been involved.   

@roamer_1

@musiclady

LOL! sorry - That was meant for @Victoria33 . I'll fix it.

[musiclady]

@musiclady

LOL! sorry - That was meant for @Victoria33 . I'll fix it.

No problem, friend!

(I was just curious).

[IsailedawayfromFR]

It's Greek to me...
But it seems to be 'false in one thing, false in everything'... Or thereabouts.

My two years of Latin tells me otherwise.

[Cyber Liberty]

My two years of Latin tells me otherwise.

I swiped it from a Google search, so it could mean "So What?"

[Cyber Liberty]

@Cyber Liberty

Nice saying, but logically it doesn't work that way.   Oh, it doesn't look good, no doubt, but the fault for this has to be laid at Allred's feet.  She was a bad choice from the outset.

This will be used to dismiss the whole story by those who were looking for a reason to do so.  Allred has made it that much more difficult for victims of sexual abuse to come forward now.

I think "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is actually listed as a "Fallacy."  However, in a courtroom, it's explained to a jury it can be used to impeach a witness's entire testimony, so it's status as a Fallacy is in some dispute.

[edpc]

I think "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is actually listed as a "Fallacy."  However, in a courtroom, it's explained to a jury it can be used to impeach a witness's entire testimony, so it's status as a Fallacy is in some dispute.

Breaking Bad - Fallacies


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8gkJ0oRCcmI

[IsailedawayfromFR]

I swiped it from a Google search, so it could mean "So What?"

it is definitely not Greek.

[Sighlass]

@Bigun

To prove that you're slobbering over a false headline?

@CatherineofAragon

Sore/Loserman is about all I can think of when I see your posts.

The headline was sensational, but it said inside the article what was needed to clear it up. Even what you quote from Bigun proves it. 

....finally admitted that she forged a portion....

This is the truth... you can try to argue that she only added stuff, but since in her televised press conference she quoted the whole thing as being wrote by Moore then that is not true.

The headline is an abbreviated review of the article... everyone that is anyone in news/politics like we are know to read beyond headlines for the nitty gritty. Breitbart did elaborate in it's full article that she claims she only changed a portion of yearbook quote. We don't know of course if that is true, she still has not released the book to be examined and probable will not (why, because even more may of been fabricated .. or not, we don't know)... All we know is she claimed ALL of the inscription was from Moore at one time and now has changed her story. She lied in claiming all of it thus in reality the headline was not an untruth.

Splinting hairs to save face is about all I see you doing. Another example is when you say mostly Trump supporters are defending Moore. Well I didn't vote Trump, I still don't like Trump for the most part, and I am defending Moore. I don't see Moore as being a Trump clone whatsoever. As a matter of fact I don't remember Moore (his wife is his voice on FB)  supporting Trump during the election. As a matter of fact, Trump sorta spit in Moore's face when he suggested Pryor was a SCOTUS candidate. Pryor was the one that grilled Moore in one of his trials about being a Christian. Lets just say, I doubt Moore has the love of Trump as some think. Moore is using Trump, just as Trump is using Moore. They are putting up a front, but a wise political bug like you and me person sees it for what it really is. They at best tolerate each other when it is wise to do so.

You can bet there will be clashes between the two. Moore like Cruz being a constitutionalist (and Christian) will clash with the Rino agendas in Washington. I can understand why they don't want Moore, but don't want to alienate Alabama at the same time. It is an ugly dance to watch.

There was more I want to say, but my carpel tunnel is acting up pretty bad. Hurts to type.

[Cyber Liberty]

IIRC, your opinion matters a lot more than mine.  You have a vote Tuesday.

[edpc]

There was more I want to say, but my carpel tunnel is acting up pretty bad. Hurts to type.

I would suggest using your phone and voice recognition feature, but I always end up doing more editing to fix all of the incorrect things it thought I said.

[DB]

Gonna thoroughly enjoy the crow eating that's coming!

It is pretty clear from how Moore signed other notes to young ladies that he signed them "Roy" without his last name. So it looks like she added his last name to make it specific to who it was. Perhaps long after the fact. She should have said that from the git-go. But that doesn't change the details of original note it looks like he wrote to a young lady in high school that he now says he never knew.

The jury is still out on this one.

And frankly the evidence isn't leaning Moore's way.

[DB]

@CatherineofAragon

Sore/Loserman is about all I can think of when I see your posts.

The headline was sensational, but it said inside the article what was needed to clear it up. Even what you quote from Bigun proves it. 

This is the truth... you can try to argue that she only added stuff, but since in her televised press conference she quoted the whole thing as being wrote by Moore then that is not true.

The headline is an abbreviated review of the article... everyone that is anyone in news/politics like we are know to read beyond headlines for the nitty gritty. Breitbart did elaborate in it's full article that she claims she only changed a portion of yearbook quote. We don't know of course if that is true, she still has not released the book to be examined and probable will not (why, because even more may of been fabricated .. or not, we don't know)... All we know is she claimed ALL of the inscription was from Moore at one time and now has changed her story. She lied in claiming all of it thus in reality the headline was not an untruth.

Splinting hairs to save face is about all I see you doing. Another example is when you say mostly Trump supporters are defending Moore. Well I didn't vote Trump, I still don't like Trump for the most part, and I am defending Moore. I don't see Moore as being a Trump clone whatsoever. As a matter of fact I don't remember Moore (his wife is his voice on FB)  supporting Trump during the election. As a matter of fact, Trump sorta spit in Moore's face when he suggested Pryor was a SCOTUS candidate. Pryor was the one that grilled Moore in one of his trials about being a Christian. Lets just say, I doubt Moore has the love of Trump as some think. Moore is using Trump, just as Trump is using Moore. They are putting up a front, but a wise political bug like you and me person sees it for what it really is. They at best tolerate each other when it is wise to do so.

You can bet there will be clashes between the two. Moore like Cruz being a constitutionalist (and Christian) will clash with the Rino agendas in Washington. I can understand why they don't want Moore, but don't want to alienate Alabama at the same time. It is an ugly dance to watch.

There was more I want to say, but my carpel tunnel is acting up pretty bad. Hurts to type.

Didn't Moore say he never knew her?

Isn't that a lie too?

There's been lying all around.

[Cyber Liberty]

Didn't Moore say he never knew her?

Isn't that a lie too?

There's been lying all around.

This has been pretty well aired out here, and it's pretty clear who believes what, and a development in the evidence over the last week hasn't changed one mind.  He either didn't do anything or he's as guilty as a dog eating feces.

The voters of AL will decide this, the rest of us are just the peanut gallery.  As spectators, we haven't had this much fun since Trump ran for president and half of us started making pu$$y hats.

[RoosGirl]

This has been pretty well aired out here, and it's pretty clear who believes what, and a development in the evidence over the last week hasn't changed one mind.  He either didn't do anything or he's as guilty as a dog eating feces.

The voters of AL will decide this, the rest of us are just the peanut gallery.  As spectators, we haven't had this much fun since Trump ran for president and half of us started making pu$$y hats.

Forgive me, but what is a "pu$$y hat"?

[Cyber Liberty]

Forgive me, but what is a "pu$$y hat"?

The hats the Feminazis were knitting with their own widdle hands for the March Against Trump last January.  It was in all the papers.

 

[roamer_1]

Didn't Moore say he never knew her?

Isn't that a lie too?

There's been lying all around.

There is a difference between a lie and a faulty memory - That there was contact has long been put to bed, and by his admission - He presided over her divorce case, which he also didn't remember, sans record. It seemed to be a revelation to his team.

So you can believe he is lying if you like. But it is just as feasible that any prior contact they'd had was incidental - I certainly don't remember every girl I went out with and every yearbook I signed... and it happens quite often that folks know me and can relate something from my past, but I don't know them from a hole in the ground, barely recalling the event.

That's part of the problem with 40 year old accusations.

[musiclady]

The hats the Feminazis were knitting with their own widdle hands for the March Against Trump last January.  It was in all the papers.

 

They were wearing them long before that march.

These so-called "feminists" are just crazy people.

[Suppressed]

I must be a psychic.


http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,293446.msg1533627.html#msg1533627

Not a very good one, as it seems you were saying the entire inscription was false.

[Hoodat]

I think "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" is actually listed as a "Fallacy."

Literally, it means "Deceptive in one thing, deceptive in all things".  Not sure of the context you saw it in, but it indicates to me that if a person lies at one thing, they shouldn't be trusted in anything.

[Cyber Liberty]

Literally, it means "Deceptive in one thing, deceptive in all things".  Not sure of the context you saw it in, but it indicates to me that if a person lies at one thing, they shouldn't be trusted in anything.

A Judge will tell a Jury that if a witness was proven to have lied.  They can either believe the rest, or they are free to dismiss the witness' entire testimony.  As to this case, who knows?  Normal rules don't apply, and folks don't have to consider the defendant innocent until proven guilty.  Many don't.