I've said it numerous times in this forum, and I'll state it again:
If I had to choose, I'd prefer a morally corrupt politician who will leave me and the rest of the citizenry alone to the squeaky-clean "honest" one who will try to impose upon me (or the country).
We -had- a corrupt governor here in Connecticut not that long ago (Rowland), who eventually went to prison for taking bribes.
BUT... while he was in office... he didn't raise my taxes, didn't try to pass any laws that restricted my freedoms (such as the gun restriction law that later got passed by the democrat-communists), and the like.
Of course, if a politician does exhibit good character as well as doing the right thing, that's a plus.
But all that talk about "character" and "morals" -- well, that and $2.01 buys a medium-sized coffee at the local Dunkin' -- and you still have to request the senior discount to get that price.
So I could care less if a President Trump tweets too much, or what have you.
What matters to me is what he DOES in office.
And so far, he's done just about everything right, to my mind.
I understand the sentiment; I've from time to time exercised my vote along similar lines.
But I see the teenybopper accusations as a means to an end. Roy Moore should not be a Senator for far more fundamental deficiencies of character. He's been adjudicated dishonest and unfit to serve twice by the State of Alabama. It is a serious thing, a dangerous thing, to be a rogue judge.
I don't give a damn at this point that his defeat will usher in a Democrat. He will be of no practical use to the Republican coalition, he is a broken arrow, and the Dems will use him as a symbol for conservative moral turpitude.
I don't want to be associated in any way, shape or form with the lawless Roy Moore. I am not proud to call for voting against party, but it is a necessary duty at this point in the course of human events.