Author Topic: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress  (Read 1585 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline corbe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,715
No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« on: November 26, 2017, 05:08:15 pm »
No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress

Posted at 7:00 pm on November 25, 2017 by Kimberly Ross


In the past few days, we’ve been subjected to news of Senator Al Franken’s grope fest and Representative Joe Barton’s nude photo sharing. This is in the midst of the Judge Roy Moore For Senate campaign, which continues full steam ahead despite the very serious (and highly-corroborated) allegations against him.

Naturally, these things chip away at the already crumbling confidence we have in those who make up Congress. Not only do too many current members of the “esteemed body” lack moral fortitude, but those seeking to join them are questionable as well.

We look at our options and realize that they are flawed individuals who will most likely disappoint us whether it be through legislation or lifestyle.

So, what’s the solution? Bill Kristol has some thoughts.

<..snip..>

https://www.redstate.com/kimberly_ross/2017/11/25/dont-need-more-women-in-congress/
No government in the 12,000 years of modern mankind history has led its people into anything but the history books with a simple lesson, don't let this happen to you.

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2017, 05:14:17 pm »
This idea from a guy who squats when he pees. Swell.

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,932
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2017, 12:09:19 am »
The premise:
"No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress"

Hearty agreement!

I would go further, and assert we need NO (or next-to-no) women in Congress, or in any position of governmental power.
They simply don't have the intestinal fortitude when the chips are down.

Call me a misogynist if you wish.
Sorry, ladies of this forum.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,730
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2017, 12:15:15 am »
The premise:
"No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress"

Hearty agreement!

I would go further, and assert we need NO (or next-to-no) women in Congress, or in any position of governmental power.
They simply don't have the intestinal fortitude when the chips are down.

Call me a misogynist if you wish.
Sorry, ladies of this forum.

Yup!  We need more babes like @corbe's avatar.

Sorry, @Frank Cannon' you lose.  Your chick has a butter face and a flat chest.  Go get another one before you crash the server again
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2017, 12:31:59 am »
Yup!  We need more babes like @corbe's avatar.

Sorry, @Frank Cannon' you lose.  Your chick has a butter face and a flat chest.  Go get another one before you crash the server again

How dare you mock Selma Blair. She a national treasure.


Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,730
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2017, 12:47:02 am »
How dare you mock Selma Blair. She a national treasure.


And as such should be taken to an island in the South Pacific to a beach, and buried.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline jpsb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,141
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2017, 12:49:59 am »
How dare you mock Selma Blair. She a national treasure.

Sorry @Frank Cannon but @Cyber Liberty right and you said my girl looks like
a dude. LOL
[IMAGE REMOVED]

At least she (my girl) has girl parts
« Last Edit: November 28, 2017, 02:46:43 pm by Mod2 »

Offline WingNot

  • Resident TBR Curmudgeon
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,659
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2017, 12:53:43 am »
Sorry @Frank Cannon but @Cyber Liberty right and you said my girl looks like
a dude. LOL
[IMAGE REMOVED]

At least she (my girl) has girl parts

Those parts point to the ground and she has to roll them up to put them to bed.
Skanky
« Last Edit: November 28, 2017, 02:46:59 pm by Mod2 »
"I'm a man, but I changed, because I had to. Oh well."

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2017, 12:55:23 am »
And as such should be taken to an island in the South Pacific to a beach, and buried.

Selma is not amused by your bullshit....

« Last Edit: November 28, 2017, 02:47:18 pm by Mod2 »

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2017, 12:56:01 am »
Those parts point to the ground and she has to roll them up to put them to bed.
Skanky

Exactly. She looks like a meth whore after a bender.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,730
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2017, 01:01:26 am »
Selma is not amused by your bullshit....


The only reason she doesn't shave her legs is because 14-year-old boys don't have to.  Geez.  Get a decent skank up, Frank!  Have some self respect.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Offline corbe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,715
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2017, 01:07:53 am »
          @Frank Cannon I'll loan ya one of mine.

« Last Edit: November 28, 2017, 02:47:28 pm by Mod2 »
No government in the 12,000 years of modern mankind history has led its people into anything but the history books with a simple lesson, don't let this happen to you.

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #12 on: November 27, 2017, 01:16:37 am »
          @Frank Cannon I'll loan ya one of mine.



Though that broad is hot, I'm standing by Selma. No one does RBF like Selma.....plus I like irritating people.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2017, 02:47:40 pm by Mod2 »

Offline RoosGirl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,759
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #13 on: November 27, 2017, 01:19:50 am »
What the hell kind of thread is this?

[IMAGE REMOVED]
« Last Edit: November 28, 2017, 02:45:28 pm by Mod2 »

Offline jpsb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,141
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #14 on: November 27, 2017, 01:24:18 am »
Those parts point to the ground and she has to roll them up to put them to bed.
Skanky

You better watch it there cowboy


Offline corbe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 38,715
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #15 on: November 27, 2017, 03:02:27 am »
   If we're gonna have a gay Thread shouldn't somebody ping the usual suspects?

   @homophobics
No government in the 12,000 years of modern mankind history has led its people into anything but the history books with a simple lesson, don't let this happen to you.

Offline Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,730
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2017, 03:07:02 am »
If @Frank Cannon is going to keep posting those pics of 14-year-old boys, yeah.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed:

Silver Pines

  • Guest
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #17 on: November 28, 2017, 12:54:02 pm »
The premise:
"No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress"

Hearty agreement!

I would go further, and assert we need NO (or next-to-no) women in Congress, or in any position of governmental power.
They simply don't have the intestinal fortitude when the chips are down.

Call me a misogynist if you wish.
Sorry, ladies of this forum.

@Fishrrman   
 
Lol

Take a look at the forum of the past few days.  Take a running tally of hysterical, all-caps posts.  Find out who threw a fit and flounced off the forum.  And get back to me with the gender of those posters.

Hint:  it’s not the women.     :laugh:

Silver Pines

  • Guest
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #18 on: November 28, 2017, 12:55:19 pm »
How dare you mock Selma Blair. She a national treasure.




@Frank Cannon

She needs long hair.  Please don’t tell me you like short hair on women.

Silver Pines

  • Guest
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2017, 12:59:16 pm »
What the hell kind of thread is this?
[IMAGE REMOVED]
@RoosGirl

I see we’re gonna have to fix another damn thread.  I’ll get to work when I’m at my laptop.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2017, 02:45:06 pm by Mod2 »

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2017, 01:06:45 pm »

Listen you. It's too early in the morning to deal with Selma haters.

@Frank Cannon

She needs long hair.  Please don’t tell me you like short hair on women.

Silver Pines

  • Guest
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #21 on: November 28, 2017, 01:16:02 pm »

Offline Gefn

  • "And though she be but little she is fierce"-Shakespeare
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,563
  • Gender: Female
  • Quos Deus Vult Perdere Prius Dementat
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #22 on: November 28, 2017, 01:35:11 pm »
@Fishrrman   
 
Lol

Take a look at the forum of the past few days.  Take a running tally of hysterical, all-caps posts.  Find out who threw a fit and flounced off the forum.  And get back to me with the gender of those posters.

Hint:  it’s not the women.     :laugh:

@CatherineofAragon

I don't care for my congresswoman

She's a nice lady but I don't think she is suited to be a congresswoman. She would have been better off staying as a church lady.
G-d bless America. G-d bless us all                                 

Adopt a puppy or kitty from your local shelter
Or an older dog or cat. They're true love❤️

Offline Frank Cannon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,097
  • Gender: Male
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #23 on: November 28, 2017, 01:58:47 pm »
@Frank Cannon


Well, aren’t we sensitive this morning!

You Never Selmas are always going after her. Nothing she does is ever good enough.

Offline RoosGirl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,759
Re: No, We Don’t Need More Women in Congress
« Reply #24 on: November 28, 2017, 02:24:43 pm »
You Never Selmas are always going after her. Nothing she does is ever good enough.

Personally I like her.  It makes me feel better about myself that someone that looks like Selma, not downright ugly but not prettier than me, can be on the big screen and is appreciated by some people.  Mila Kunis and Jennifer Aniston are too hard to compete with; and Paris' boobs forget about it.