RNC, NRSC have no plans to back Moore after Trump threw support behind him

[corbe]

RNC, NRSC have no plans to back Moore after Trump threw support behind him

By Max Greenwood  - 11/22/17 11:55 AM EST  

The Republican National Committee (RNC) and the party's Senate campaign arm will not support GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore in Alabama's special Senate election, even after President Trump stood by him on Tuesday.

According to The Associated Press, officials with the RNC and the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) said they have no intention of reconsidering an earlier decision to pull support for Moore, who has been accused of pursuing sexual and romantic relations with teenage girls in his 30s.

The two GOP committees severed ties with the candidate earlier this month, ending their financial and field support for his campaign. Dozens of Republican officials have also called on Moore in recent days to withdraw his Senate bid.

<..snip..>

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/361555-rnc-nrsc-have-no-plans-to-back-moore-after-trump-threw-support-behind-him

[corbe]

    As aptly pointed out by other Briefers, this Forum needs Moore cowbell.

[Cyber Liberty]

    As aptly pointed out by other Briefers, this Forum needs Moore cowbell.

Thought you were going to give the Moore stories a rest...lol.

[Jazzhead]

Good.  Not one cent of national Republican money for Roy Moore.  Let the evangelicals in Alabama soil themselves to support this lawless hypocrite.   

[Cyber Liberty]

Good.  Not one cent of national Republican money for Roy Moore.  Let the evangelicals in Alabama soil themselves to support this lawless hypocrite.   

Please supply a list of figures for how much the RNC and the RNSC has put into this race so far.  I'll wait...

I happen to agree with you,BTW.  If Moore gets elected, he'll owe the Mitch McConnells of the world bupkis.

[libertybele]

Good.  Not one cent of national Republican money for Roy Moore.  Let the evangelicals in Alabama soil themselves to support this lawless hypocrite.   

Again ... where is your proof that he is guilty?

[Jazzhead]

Again ... where is your proof that he is guilty?

There's no "proof" in the sense needed to obtain a criminal conviction.   We have only the sum total of these women's statements and other evidence suggesting Moore's teen-dogging was open and notorious in the community.   

Believe the evidence or don't believe it.   I choose to believe it.   Does it disqualify him from office?   Obviously it doesn't for some, because of the "R" beside his name.   For me,  he's disqualified because of his lawlessness,  even before the question of his perviness is considered.   

[Cyber Liberty]

There's no "proof" in the sense needed to obtain a criminal conviction.   We have only the sum total of these women's statements and other evidence suggesting Moore's teen-dogging was open and notorious in the community.   

Believe the evidence or don't believe it.   I choose to believe it.   Does it disqualify him from office?   Obviously it doesn't for some, because of the "R" beside his name.   For me,  he's disqualified because of his lawlessness,  even before the question of his perviness is considered.

Fortunately, you have no vote and therefore zero influence.  All you can do it bark at the moon, and that's a good thing.  Woof, woof!

[Bigun]

Please supply a list of figures for how much the RNC and the RNSC has put into this race so far.  I'll wait...

I happen to agree with you,BTW.  If Moore gets elected, he'll owe the Mitch McConnells of the world bupkis.

Roy Moore hasn't gotten any Republican money but he damned sure has gotten some of mine and another check goes out in Monday's mail!

[Free Vulcan]

There's no "proof" in the sense needed to obtain a criminal conviction.   We have only the sum total of these women's statements and other evidence suggesting Moore's teen-dogging was open and notorious in the community.   

Believe the evidence or don't believe it.   I choose to believe it.   Does it disqualify him from office?   Obviously it doesn't for some, because of the "R" beside his name.   For me,  he's disqualified because of his lawlessness,  even before the question of his perviness is considered.

Court Documents Raise Significant Questions About Leigh Corfman’s Accusations Against Roy Moore

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/21/court-documents-raise-significant-questions-leigh-corfmans-accusations-roy-moore/


BOOM! Witness Drops Bomb! PROVES Gloria Allred and Accuser Nelson Were Lying – SAYS MEDIA WOULD NOT TALK With HER

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/boom-witness-drops-bomb-proves-gloria-allred-accuser-nelson-lying-says-media-not-talk/


EXCLUSIVE: Ex-Boyfriend of Roy Moore Accuser: I Don’t Believe Her

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/20/exclusive-ex-boyfriend-of-roy-moore-accuser-i-dont-believe-her/

[Cyber Liberty]

Even Charlie Manson got his day in court, but no soup for Moore!

[Bigun]

Even Charlie Manson got his day in court, but no soup for Moore!

Nope! Having the citizen actually pick their own representatives is verboten! Can't have that!

[Cyber Liberty]

Roy Moore hasn't gotten any Republican money but he damned sure has gotten some of mine and another check goes out in Monday's mail!

I can't find any evidence the Party has given any money to the Moore campaign.  I only can find stories that they weren't going to after he beat Strange.   

[Jazzhead]

Fortunately, you have no vote and therefore zero influence.  All you can do it bark at the moon, and that's a good thing.  Woof, woof!

You're right.  Only the voters of Alabama can decide if they want a lawless hypocrite representing them in the Senate.   

[Cyber Liberty]

You're right.  Only the voters of Alabama can decide if they want a lawless hypocrite representing them in the Senate.

Yup!  Of course, if we weeded out all the lawless hypocrites from Congress and the Senate, there would be nobody left.  The cream does not rise to the top in Politics, it's something else that does.  I usually pull the flush handle when it happens at my house.   

[Jazzhead]

Yup!  Of course, if we weeded out all the lawless hypocrites from Congress and the Senate, there would be nobody left.  The cream does not rise to the top in Politics, it's something else that does.  I usually pull the flush handle when it happens at my house.   

All true, of course.   But while the lot in DC may be a bunch of weasels, it doesn't mean that I as a voter can't hold my actions to a higher standard.  If I were a voter in Alabama,  I'd write in Mr. Brooks.  I understand the loss of the seat may be crippling to the GOP.  But I like to shower before I vote in the morning, not after.   

[libertybele]

There's no "proof" in the sense needed to obtain a criminal conviction.   We have only the sum total of these women's statements and other evidence suggesting Moore's teen-dogging was open and notorious in the community.   

Believe the evidence or don't believe it.   I choose to believe it.   Does it disqualify him from office?   Obviously it doesn't for some, because of the "R" beside his name.   For me,  he's disqualified because of his lawlessness,  even before the question of his perviness is considered.

??? Sum total of women's statements??  I'm looking at additional facts; the accuser's attorney so far has refused to turn over the yearbook with his alleged signature; that in itself is suspect.  He's been in the political arena for 40 years and this is the first that anything like this has been brought forward about him; that is also suspect.  McConnell raised a ton of money to ensure he did NOT get elected; a tactic often used by McConnell and the NRSC; that is also suspect. 

You are saying people are going to vote for him because he has an 'R' next to his name.  In the same light the DEMS and the GOPe are drumming up as much negativity against him as possible, just because he has an 'R' next to his name.

For shame!  What happened to innocent until P R O V E N guilty??  That seems to only apply to the DEMS and to the GOPe.  Sad.

[Jazzhead]

Sorry, LB,  I'm not "ashamed" to declare that a man who was twice removed from his office by the State of Alabama for lawlessness is not fit to serve in the U.S. Senate. 

They finally got Al Capone for tax evasion.  Similarly,  if these credible charges can help keep this lawless hypocrite from being elected to the Senate,  I have no objection whatsoever.     

[INVAR]

None of the accusations are credible and we hope the people of Alabama vote for whom best represents their interests, and we will delight in watching you Godless Marxists foam-at-the-mouth in outrage.