Author Topic: Petra Nova is one of two carbon capture and sequestration power plants in the world  (Read 998 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Petra Nova is one of two carbon capture and sequestration power plants in the world
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=33552
OCTOBER 31, 2017



The Petra Nova facility, a coal-fired power plant located near Houston, Texas, is one of only two operating power plants with carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the world, and it is the only such facility in the United States. The 110 megawatt (MW) Boundary Dam plant in Saskatchewan, Canada, near the border with North Dakota, is the other electric utility facility using a CCS system.

A third power plant in Kemper County, Mississippi, is capable of burning natural gas as well as lignite coal and was expected to be fully operational and capable of using CCS by mid-2014. However, Kemper has operated primarily on natural gas, essentially as a combined-cycle plant, since August 2014. In June 2017, Mississippi Power made the decision to suspend operations activities relating to the coal gasification process, electing to operate Kemper strictly as a natural gas-fired combined-cycle plant. Kemper has also abandoned plans to use technology to capture its greenhouse gas emissions.

CCS technology mitigates the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the combustion of fossil fuels. Three potential approaches allow power plants to capture CO2:

- Post-combustion capture involves sending the power plant’s emissions through an absorption process where a solvent captures up to 90% of the CO2. The recovered CO2 goes through a regenerator that strips the CO2 from the solvent while the remaining emissions (primarily nitrogen) are vented to the atmosphere.

- With oxy-combustion capture, the fossil fuel is burned in pure oxygen instead of air. The result of this process captures nearly pure CO2.

- With pre-combustion capture, the fossil fuel is turned into a synthetic gas consisting of relatively pure hydrogen and CO2.

Petra Nova’s post-combustion CO2 capture system began operations in January 2017. The 240-megawatt (MW) carbon capture system that was added to Unit 8 (654 MW capacity) of the existing W.A. Parish pulverized coal-fired generating plant receives about 37% of Unit 8’s emissions, which are diverted through a flue gas slipstream. Petra Nova’s carbon-capture system is designed to capture about 90% of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted from the flue gas slipstream, or about 33% of the total emissions from Unit 8. The post-combustion process is energy intensive and requires a dedicated natural gas unit to accommodate the energy requirements of the carbon-capture process.



The carbon dioxide captured by Petra Nova’s system is then used in enhanced oil recovery at nearby oil fields. Enhanced oil recovery involves injecting water, chemicals, or gases (such as carbon dioxide) into oil reservoirs to increase the ability of oil to flow to a well.

By comparison, Kemper had been designed to capture about 65% of the plant’s CO2 using a pre-combustion system. The capital costs associated with the Kemper project were initially estimated at $2.4 billion, or about $4,100 per kilowatt (kW), but cost overruns led to construction costs in excess of $7.5 billion (nearly $13,000/kW). Petra Nova CCS retrofit costs were reported to be $1 billion, or $4,200/kW, and the project was completed on budget and on time.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Petra Nova - WA Parish Generating Station
http://www.nrg.com/generation/projects/petra-nova/

Petra Nova, a 50/50 joint venture between NRG and JX Nippon Oil & Gas Exploration, operates a commercial-scale post-combustion carbon capture facility at NRG's WA Parish generating station southwest of Houston, Texas.





Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,752
Am curious as to the unit cost ($ per mcf) of the capture of the CO2 and its corresponding sales price to the oil operators who beneficially use it in the field.

As a young engineer , I worked a number of the nearby Houston fields which are likely using that CO2 for added oil recoveries.

It seems a win-win, but I bet the unit costs of CO2 deliveries are quite high.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2017, 12:47:20 pm by IsailedawayfromFR »
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Am curious as to the unit cost ($ per mcf) of the capture of the CO2 and its corresponding sales price to the oil operators who beneficially use it in the field.

As a young engineer , I worked a number of the nearby Houston fields which are likely using that CO2 for added oil recoveries.

It seems a win-win, but I bet the unit costs of CO2 deliveries are quite high.

I haven't found cost and sales price, but I did find this interesting:

Tackling parasitic load as well as generating revenue. To handle the carbon capture system’s parasitic load, NRG built a 70-MW natural gas–fired cogeneration plant as part of the Petra Nova project. Excess power from the plant is sold on the Texas grid.

http://www.powermag.com/capturing-carbon-and-seizing-innovation-petra-nova-is-powers-plant-of-the-year/?pagenum=5
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline IsailedawayfromFR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,752
I haven't found cost and sales price, but I did find this interesting:

Tackling parasitic load as well as generating revenue. To handle the carbon capture system’s parasitic load, NRG built a 70-MW natural gas–fired cogeneration plant as part of the Petra Nova project. Excess power from the plant is sold on the Texas grid.

http://www.powermag.com/capturing-carbon-and-seizing-innovation-petra-nova-is-powers-plant-of-the-year/?pagenum=5
Good to see some oil coming out from the CO2 injections.

My knowledge of the type of reservoirs, oil tells me these are good CO2 candidates;  high perm, medium depth, relatively thick, water-drives with a fair amount residual oil left to justify the effort.

We tried CO2 almost 40 years ago in a half-hearted effort to get more oil.  It was almost exclusively justified by the fact we could generate 'new' oil by EOR and get 3X the price of oil due to the rules of the Jimmy-Carter DOE which overlorded all oil pricing in the late 70s.
No punishment, in my opinion, is too great, for the man who can build his greatness upon his country's ruin~  George Washington