But no, that isn't what will happen, even as other equality testing means never have worked.
What equality testing means? I've said over and over again that to allow the government to play editor on content is colossally foolish.
So far the only proposal I have suggested is that it prevent discrimination against hiring of conservatives in the media corporations.
The government would not regulate content. The government would not enforce equality of content. They would simply require equal application of the law as stated in the 14th amendment.
I think the fact of having conservatives in the production process would create balance inherently, because if Liberals tried to get away with the sh*t they currently do, the Conservatives would object to it, and it would therefore not air. By the same token, news stories that conservatives believe should be shown, would be shown, because they would be in position to make such determinations.
Unintended consequences.
With a system that is already 99% over on the enemy's side. Any disruptions, any "unintended consequences" will degrade what exists now. I count that as a good thing.
Fed deciding the defining parameters of what is called 'Conservative'. AND WHAT ISN'T. Who is, and who isn't.
That is the concept you people keep trying to force on us and claim it's "our" idea. No, that is *NOT* what we want, and it is not what any of us has proposed. You just keep asserting that's what we want, and it isn't.
The FED designing Conservative content - Be very careful what you wish for.
I don't wish for that. I know it's what a lot of you want to believe about us, but it is incorrect, and if you would bother to actually understand what we are saying, you would realize your cliched arguments are not what we are advocating.
You are handing your own ass into the hands of the very people who hate you.
Yeah.. that'll work out fine.
That's what we have now. Degrading the status quo can only improve the situation.