And you keep coming back again and again to your bullshit. If you go on his website, you'll find that he no longer takes orders for custom wedding cakes.
His actions after the fact have ZERO bearing on what occurred. And the reason he no longer takes orders for wedding cakes is because he refuses to be forced at the point of a gun to make a product against his will.
His CURRENT practice is to discriminate with respect to the product he makes.
That was his former practice as well. He has remained consistent, except that he is now denied the freedom (at the point of a gun) to make the wedding cakes he wants to make.
All customers are treated the same - if they want a custom wedding cake, they'll have to go elsewhere.
All customers were treated the same before, too. If they wanted a wedding cake for a wedding not sanctioned under Colorado law, they had to go elsewhere.
His PAST practice was very different - he advertised as his specialty the creation of wedding cakes, yet in practice he denied this service to his gay customers - no matter what design or message they may have requested for the cake. That was discrimination with respect to his customer , and that is what is unlawful.
Bullshit, bullshit, and more bullshit. First of all, sexual preference was not discussed with the customers. There is nothing in the court records that indicated the customers revealed their sexual preference to the baker. Secondly, at no time were the customers denied service. The court records are quite clear about this. Neither side denies it. Yet here you are again flat out lying about it. That makes you a liar. Thirdly, a heterosexual woman also asked for a same-sex wedding cake, and she too was told that the baker did not make that type of cake. So the discrimination against a certain product was experienced by both heterosexual and homosexual customers equally. So your claim that the customer was discriminated against simply because of his sexual preference is pure unadulterated bullshit.
But then you knew that already.