da goat wrote:
"What all or many of the "experts" (apart from this shrink) do not understand is that at some point some things might have to be banned. Islam is one of those things. Want to come into our modern, civilized country where women aren't killed for talking to strange men or wearing western clothing? You don't want to tolerate different religions or atheists? You want to convert or kill them because they're not Muslims?
Renounce your backwards religion, and we'll think about letting you in."
I wholeheartedly agree with you.
And that's why this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Must be changed to this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. The followers of muhammed are specifically excluded and denied the protections of this amendment along with any and all other Constitutional protections. Neither the United States nor the Several States will offer such protections or liberties to the followers of muhammed."