‘Homosexual Conduct Should Be Illegal,’ Roy Moore Said in ‘05 Interview

[RoosGirl]

Let the record show:  This compelling argument is from the social conservative wing of the superior intellectuals that float above mere mortal Americans.     


I'm out .... before the next strategy presented is true conservatives must stand against sexual relations .... period.

Let the record also show that you are just fine with gov't regulating fire retardants in bedding but don't care about stopping the spread of HIV and other disease that unhealthy sexual relations can spread.

[corbe]

I just don't think that the Government should regulate what goes on in the bedroom. Especially between two consenting adults.

   I agree @kevindavis and had the homos kept their abhorrent behavior 'in the bedroom' we probably wouldn't be having this discussion.  We gave them an inch by repealing sodomy laws in the 60's/70's, which were rarely, if ever enforced and they took a mile by indoctrinating our children and subjugating every American to their deviancy and the fallacy that we must now accept them.

   I should stick to my tried and true rule of staying away from Threads involving homo's or race relations, it never ends well for me when I participate.

   PS:  I have no problem with Lezzy's.

[Frank Cannon]

Gay Pedophile Priest = Bad

Gay Pedophile Boy Scout Leader = Good


Can someone explain that to me?

The pedophile Boy Scout leader knows how to pitch a tent.

[RAT Patrol]

If it stops child molesters and AIDS spreaders,  it is of great benefit to the country.

I guess he thinks sex with a dog, a sibling, a parent, an uncle....should all be legal, too.  Or all of the above at the same time so long as it is in a bedroom.  Next he will demand that bakers make cakes celebrating those things or pay $150,000 fine.  Some freedom.  Oh....and we MUST teach children in the public schools that all these nasty things are really wonderful and that anyone who says otherwise is a bigot.

[DiogenesLamp]

This is incoherent. How does the Government overregulating in some areas mean they should police consenting behavior between adults?

The "government"  used to lock people up for cohabitation.   They used to prosecute people for adultery.   It has always been in the best interest of society and the populace to enforce monogamy,   and it is only since they have stopped doing it  that society has pretty much gone to h3ll.   


One of my most strongly felt positions is about how the government tolerates people creating children they can't pay for or feed.   I saw a news story the other day about a man that had 11 children from three different women,  all of which are on welfare. 


This is a recipe for destruction,   and we shouldn't tolerate it.   Yes,  the government should be regulating this behavior in the bedroom.   


Make a child you can't pay for,  and the government should insist your nuts get snipped and the woman's tubes tied.    You may pawn one of your offspring off on the rest of us,   but we ought to have a right to stop you if you are going to try to do it again.   

[Smokin Joe]

If you think the "Drug War"  (it isn't really a war,  they just call it that to make it sound as if they are serious about it)   is bad,  you should see what happens when a nation doesn't have one. 


China was utterly destroyed by legalized drugs.   100 million people ended up dying as a consequence of legalized drugs in China,  and their society was set back a hundred years or so.

The 'war' just makes sure the right people get through and their competition is hindered or wiped out. If we wanted to 'win', we'd have rolled in tomahawks on the cartel chiefs long ago, just like destroying a chemical plant. No way we don't have the capability to get that intel and act on it. The respective governments either can't or won't take care of the problem. If it's the latter, it's just us. If the former, why fear a government that can't even clean up the cartels?

For the same reason that the border is still unsecured, someone is making a lot of money with the status quo.

The war isn't about controlling drugs, it's about controlling us.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Let the record also show that you are just fine with gov't regulating fire retardants in bedding but don't care about stopping the spread of HIV and other disease that unhealthy sexual relations can spread.

Yeah .. THIS is why you want to watch what adults do in their bedrooms.   

[DiogenesLamp]

Edited to add:  This intrusive POV is a large part of the reason why conservatives cannot gain national traction.

No,  that view used to be common in the United States.   The reason conservatives cannot gain national traction is because every means of mass communication with the American public must go through Liberal Censors in New York,  who when they are not censoring our position,  are advocating 24-7  for the opposite position.   


The media steers the public.   If you doubt it,  then why do they need to censor us?   

[Smokin Joe]

Yeah .. THIS is why you want to watch what adults do in their bedrooms.   

No thanks. I'm not into watching normal sex, much less deviancy.

[Suppressed]

Let the record also show that you are just fine with gov't regulating fire retardants in bedding but don't care about stopping the spread of HIV and other disease that unhealthy sexual relations can spread.

To be fair, if a person in an apartment building is using unretarded materials, he is putting many innocent people at risk in case of a fire.

Plus, your disease thing doesn't have to do with genders. 

[XenaLee]

Except that it does.

Not only does it champion deviant sex, it will punish any objection to it - and force you to labor for it.

A little leaven, leavens the entire thing.

It (government) also regulates the murder of infants-in-the-womb and determines how many "freebie abortions" women can have in one calendar year.

[Suppressed]

The reason conservatives cannot gain national traction is because every means of mass communication with the American public must go through Liberal Censors in New York,  who when they are not censoring our position,  are advocating 24-7  for the opposite position.

Who censored this post you just made?

Who censors your ability to host a web-based outlet?

Who censors your ability to create another platform?

[driftdiver]

Yeah .. THIS is why you want to watch what adults do in their bedrooms.   

@Right_in_Virginia
Making it illegal won't stop it.   Just because its legal doesn't mean its not bad for people and for the country.

[RoosGirl]

Yeah .. THIS is why you want to watch what adults do in their bedrooms.   

Oh, you don't like me purposely drawing false conclusions about your statements either?  Imagine that.

[anubias]

The pedophile Boy Scout leader knows how to pitch a tent.

 

[driftdiver]

To be fair, if a person in an apartment building is using unretarded materials, he is putting many innocent people at risk in case of a fire.

Plus, your disease thing doesn't have to do with genders.

@Suppressed
The laws aren't limited to multi-tenet buildings.  In fact the laws requiring fire retardant materials in clothing and bedding don't specify anything about the dwelling.

HIV/AIDS is almost non-existent in the population where homosexual activity or drug abuse do not exist. 

[Right_in_Virginia]

Oh, you don't like me purposely drawing false conclusions about your statements either?  Imagine that.

I didn't draw a false conclusion .. purposely or otherwise.   

[driftdiver]

Who censored this post you just made?

Who censors your ability to host a web-based outlet?

Who censors your ability to create another platform?

@Suppressed
Google for starters

[DiogenesLamp]

@driftdiver

If you want to continue to support and advocate for a government intruding into and regulating consensual adult sexual relations ... I suggest you stop asking why conservatives are falling deeper and deeper into the dustbin of political irrelevance.

I'm not asking,  I know why.   It is because the liberals have a trillion dollar broadcasting infrastructure that has effectively turned the intent of the founders (in regard to protecting freedom of speech)  on it's head. 


They can get their message out.   We cannot.   They control the airwaves,  and they use them to launch constant propaganda against us,  as with Jimmy Kimmel turning his "entertainment"  show into an hour long propaganda effort against repealing Obamacare. 


In this nation,  Liberals have the ability to speak to the masses of people.   Our side has nothing like this.   Where we can speak to hundreds or thousands through the back door of the internet,   they routinely speak to millions of viewers every single day.   They weave their propaganda into their entertainment shows.   The modern American television system is nothing but a large dispenser of constant liberal propaganda. 


*THAT*  is why we have difficulty maintaining national traction.   They own the airwaves,  and we can't access them,  or if we can,  it is with heavy censorship and massive doses of rebuttal opinion added to anything we say.   

[Suppressed]

@Suppressed
The laws aren't limited to multi-tenet buildings.  In fact the laws requiring fire retardant materials in clothing and bedding don't specify anything about the dwelling.

Agreed.  Perhaps there should be a restriction to allow it only in single dwellings without children or nonconsensual adults.

Makes more sense than regulating private, personal behavior.

HIV/AIDS is almost non-existent in the population where homosexual activity or drug abuse do not exist.

And poses no threat to those who aren't exposed.

[Suppressed]

@Suppressed
Google for starters

Google censored this post?  I wonder what it said before Google somehow got into @mystery-ak's server or my browser!

[Smokin Joe]

To be fair, if a person in an apartment building is using unretarded materials, he is putting many innocent people at risk in case of a fire.

Plus, your disease thing doesn't have to do with genders.

Why, if their materials are fire retardant? (We're talking about pajamas and linnens, not building construction).

G.R.I.D. (now known as "AIDS" because Gay Related Immune Deficiency was somehow not politically correct enough) damned sure does have a lot to do with homosexuality, and initially was gender specific.

It has been spread to non-homosexuals by 'switch-hitters' and 'anything goes' people, IV drug users, contaminated blood/products, even poorly sterilized surgical equipment, but like the old joke, it got to San Francisco in the back of a Hudson, and at one time it was confined to the homosexual (male) population.

Now, of course, with Obamacare, those of us who can no longer afford health insurance get to buy it for those 1.3 million HIV/AIDS patients who will cost a trillion dollars for medical care in their lifetime (and that does not include the ones they will infect).

[Sanguine]

It'll be fine.  The Great 0bama was against homosexuality before he evolved and became for it. 

[DiogenesLamp]

@DiogenesLamp

If it saves one child!

thats the argument they like

One child?  Something like 40% of all child molestations are of boys.     These guys are pretty busy for only 1.8% of the population. 

[RoosGirl]

I didn't draw a false conclusion .. purposely or otherwise.   

Of course you did.  All of my comments are in relation to the specific  example of how some people are perfectly content to allow the gov't to mandate what must be in my bed all in the name of safety, but don't care a lick what happens on it regardless of how deadly that can be.  Don't think homosexual behavior should be "regulated" by the gov't in the name of smaller gov't?  That's fine, but then don't turn around and tell me that regulation of basically all materials that are in my home is okay.