Ted Cruz says 'consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want in the bedroom' as he promises his account will never like porn again

[DCPatriot]

Oh the irony.  Remember in June of 2016, when you said that those not supporting Trump were the same as alQaeda and ISIS?

You got f'n gall, calling me a personal attacker

If the f'n shoe fits...WEAR IT!   It's ALL you do.

You've been warned by nobody less than @mystery-ak to cut the crap with the "orange" references, etc., in referring to President Trump's supporters/voters.

And yet....here we are.

[Silver Pines]

"the obsessive need to pit the senator against the president "

Lol, this was actually posted by the Trump follower who implied Heidi Cruz had a breakdown on the side of the road because Ted doesn't cut it in the bedroom.  Gotta love it!

#comedysunday

[InHeavenThereIsNoBeer]

You haven't documented jack shit.  All you did was pull a quote from wikipedia that anyone including yourself could have written.  It was a quote which you clearly did not bother to read because it discredits your very own argument.  Your quote again says that the Attorney General's office declined to defend the law.  So to say that Ted Cruz opted out is a flat out lie.  Which of course makes you a liar, which you proved yourself from your asinine wiki post.

But he did use really big letters.

[corbe]

   If Cruz is the king of the Gay Mafia, Dapper Don is surely a capo, don't recall Cruz holding up a rainbow flag during the campaign.



   Just a little off topic but last night on Trumpbart quite a few Trumpers were accusing Bannon of working with the Koch Brothers and Mercer to primary Trump with Cruz in 2020, their Cruz paranoia is reaching the tin foil hat level as is evident here also.

[Silver Pines]

Don't forget that Trump himself pretty much called them thoughtless and stupid when he said he could shoot someone and they would still support him.

Unfortunately, he seems to have been right about them, and we're seeing it at work....   

@CatherineofAragon

@musiclady

Yes, he did.  Trump understands his fans, and he has all along.  He said in his book that he knows what people want to hear & what to tell them.

The statement you reference is that of a con man openly bragging to his marks that his con is a success.  I wouldn't tolerate that from anyone in real life, and certainly not from some politician.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Here is what I can tell you about Ted Cruz as a politician!  Thus far he has done in office EXACTLY what he said he would do while campaigning for that office!  That stands in stark contrast to your Beau Trump!

It doesn't stand in stark contract to the President, @Bigun although I can understand why you'd say this.  Every time one member of the media throws out a shiny new anti-Trump "story", the rest of the media catches it and runs with it.  By the time it's proven untrue, hundreds of posts have been made here (and other places) condemning the President and ridiculing his supporters.  There is a new feeding frenzy every day.  One would almost think it's intentional.

So far, to highlight just a few efforts, he's done pretty damn well against some formidable opposition on both sides of the swamp.  He ended dozens of Obama's EO's, including growth stifling regulations and the EPA, he's pulled us out of TPP and the Paris Climate Accord, he's renegotiating NAFTA, he fought like hell for and met repeatedly with the Republican caucus to repeal and replace Obamacare .... but the Republican Senatorial caucus wasn't having any of it. 

He's nominated dozens of federal judges .... but our esteemed Republican Senate has neither time nor interest in helping to fundamentally change the makeup of the federal bench.  (Imagine what the President could accomplish with a functioning Senate)

The President ended Obama's EO on DACA and placed it in the hands of Congress .... who had been begging for the ball.

Tax reform requires (thanks to McConnell's obstinance) 60 votes in the Senate ... so he's looking to pick off Democrat Senators to help pass it.  He's playing the cards he's been dealt .... but to so many this move proves he's Satan reincarnated.

And, yes, Bigun, the wall will be built.

I don't understand why a successful President Trump and a successful Senator Cruz cannot coexist.  They worked quite well together trying to repeal/replace Obamacare.  They were very respectful--dare I say friendly--when together in Houston after Harvey.  We shouldn't be pitting these two against each other, we should be encouraging their alliance.

And, last but not least, I like President Trump.  I still find his "candor" refreshing and I still believe him and in his agenda.  If that makes him my "beau" Bigun ..... so be it.   ^-^

[Oceander]

Trump now has more Conservative accomplishments than Cruz,

Trump has rolled back Obama's executive orders, acted on social conservative issues.

We hear the broken record of Cruz being the Conservative but now, Trump has the real results, not just Mark Levin's checklist conservativism, if the Senate is broke and not passing bills, that has to be taken into account.

/snicker

[Silver Pines]

   If Cruz is the king of the Gay Mafia, Dapper Don is surely a capo, don't recall Cruz holding up a rainbow flag during the campaign.



   Just a little off topic but last night on Trumpbart quite a few Trumpers were accusing Bannon of working with the Koch Brothers and Mercer to primary Trump with Cruz in 2020, their Cruz paranoia is reaching the tin foil hat level as is evident here also.

@corbe

That might explain what we're seeing.

[andy58-in-nh]

Well, although I have been safely out of internet range up in Quebec for the past ten days, I can see that not much has changed around here in post-modern America.

Our President is still driving people to extremes, tangible ground between seething hatred and mindless worship notwithstanding.

If you think Trump is bad, you ought to get a load of Monsieur Trudeau.

[catfish1957]

If the f'n shoe fits...WEAR IT!   It's ALL you do.

You've been warned by nobody less than @mystery-ak to cut the crap with the "orange" references, etc., in referring to President Trump's supporters/voters.

And yet....here we are.

Hey calling you and your ilk orange is kind, versus the truly descriptive  "duped naive " collective.

[RoosGirl]

Cruz had a chance to stop the homosexual agenda and he did nothing. And that is the bottom line on Ted Cruz.

Okay. Sure.

[RoosGirl]

"the obsessive need to pit the senator against the president "

Lol, this was actually posted by the Trump follower who implied Heidi Cruz had a breakdown on the side of the road because Ted doesn't cut it in the bedroom.  Gotta love it!

#comedysunday

And said that about Heidi Cruz because someone said something mean about Melania.   

[Right_in_Virginia]

And said that about Heidi Cruz because someone said something mean about Melania.   

OMG @RoosGirl ... get a life.  Vapid is no way to go through forums. 

[Oceander]

OMG @RoosGirl ... get a life.  Vapid is no way to go through forums. 

Sez the vapidity expert. 

[Right_in_Virginia]

Hey calling you and your ilk orange is kind, versus the truly descriptive  "duped naive " collective.

Why must you call the President's supporters anything at all @catfish1957 ?

Have you nothing else to offer?

[catfish1957]

OMG @RoosGirl ... get a life.  Vapid is no way to go through forums.

Any candidate who would hire Stone/Pecker  as campaign strategist is reflective of the candidate and his supporters.  People don't forget.

Deal with it.

[Oceander]

Why must you call the President's supporters anything at all @catfish1957 ?

Have you nothing else to offer?

Since the supporters of Trump(D) are generally immune to logic, and even to common sense, what else is there?

[mystery-ak]

STOP THE PERSONAL INSULTS
STOP THE THREATS OF VIOLENCE.....THIS IS THE FIRST AND ONLY WARNING

[Applewood]

The case was Lawrence vs TEXAS.

Are you telling me the solicitor General of Texas could not have walked into the AG office and said "I want to represent Texas in Lawrence vs TEXAS case. Really? The biggest most important gay mafia case ever? I am not buying that. Cruz and Abbett took a pass and because of that we have open homosexuals in our military, same sex marriage, etc. Harris county asked Cruz/Abbett to help with the case, crickets.

I guess you still don't understand the relationship between boss and employee. Cruz could say he wanted to represent Texas in this case, but if HIS BOSS, the Attorney General, said his office was not going to represent Texas in that case, Cruz would have been barred from doing so on his own.  It would have been improper and possibly illegal for Cruz to disobey his boss and try to represent Texas in this matter.  In business, he would have been fired.  In this case, he might have lost his job, his license to practice law and maybe he would have faced jail time.

Why is this so difficult to understand?   Were you perhaps never a subordinate to someone else?

Oh and I'm not sure Greg Abbott would have been able to override the previous AG's decision. 

[jpsb]

I guess you still don't understand the relationship between boss and employee. Cruz could say he wanted to represent Texas in this case, but if HIS BOSS, the Attorney General, said his office was not going to represent Texas in that case, Cruz would have been barred from doing so on his own.  It would have been improper and possibly illegal for Cruz to disobey his boss and try to represent Texas in this matter.  In business, he would have been fired.  In this case, he might have lost his job, his license to practice law and maybe he would have faced jail time.

Why is this so difficult to understand?   Were you perhaps never a subordinate to someone else?

Oh and I'm not sure Greg Abbott would have been able to override the previous AG's decision.

I've walked into my bosses office plenty of times and told him/her what I wanted to do and what I was going to do. And I've had folks that worked for me walk into my office and do the same. Cruz absolutely could have walked into Abbett office and gotten the OK to represent Texas.

But both Abbott and Cruz played it safe and homosexual agenda scored the winning touchdown. Nothing has been the same since Lawrence vs Texas. The assault on Christian values went into high gear once the Marxist left realized that no one on the right of any note was going to oppose them. Cruz was new on the job so Abbott deserves more blame then Cruz but Cruz could have done something had Cruz really wanted to do something.

[txradioguy]

I guess you still don't understand the relationship between boss and employee. Cruz could say he wanted to represent Texas in this case, but if HIS BOSS, the Attorney General, said his office was not going to represent Texas in that case, Cruz would have been barred from doing so on his own.  It would have been improper and possibly illegal for Cruz to disobey his boss and try to represent Texas in this matter.  In business, he would have been fired.  In this case, he might have lost his job, his license to practice law and maybe he would have faced jail time.

Why is this so difficult to understand?   Were you perhaps never a subordinate to someone else?

Oh and I'm not sure Greg Abbott would have been able to override the previous AG's decision.

If the AG told Cruz no...the only way Cruz could have gotten in on the case would have been to resign his position and then file an Amicus brief.

Otherwise his hands were tied.

[txradioguy]

I've walked into my bosses office plenty of times and told him/her what I wanted to do and what I was going to do. And I've had folks that worked for me walk into my office and do the same. Cruz absolutely could have walked into Abbett office and gotten the OK to represent Texas.

But both Abbott and Cruz played it safe and homosexual agenda scored the winning touchdown. Nothing has been the same since Lawrence vs Texas. The assault on Christian values went into high gear once the Marxist left realized that no one on the right of any note was going to oppose them. Cruz was new on the job so Abbott deserves more blame then Cruz but Cruz could have done something had Cruz really wanted to do something.

Cool story bro...

[Cyber Liberty]

I've walked into my bosses office plenty of times and told him/her what I wanted to do and what I was going to do. And I've had folks that worked for me walk into my office and do the same. Cruz absolutely could have walked into Abbett office and gotten the OK to represent Texas.

This is one of many ways Government operates differently from Business.

[jpsb]

Cool story bro...

The only excuse I would find plausible is that both Abbott and Cruz knew the case was an unwinable waste of time. But no one is making that argument and I'd need to hear it from someone creditable (NeverTrumpers/Cruzers are not creditable).

[Applewood]

I've walked into my bosses office plenty of times and told him/her what I wanted to do and what I was going to do. And I've had folks that worked for me walk into my office and do the same. Cruz absolutely could have walked into Abbett office and gotten the OK to represent Texas.

But both Abbott and Cruz played it safe and homosexual agenda scored the winning touchdown. Nothing has been the same since Lawrence vs Texas. The assault on Christian values went into high gear once the Marxist left realized that no one on the right of any note was going to oppose them. Cruz was new on the job so Abbott deserves more blame then Cruz but Cruz could have done something had Cruz really wanted to do something.

You're still wrong, but after all these posts and you still don't get it, I'm done trying to explain it to you.  Believe what you want.  I think most of the rest of us know better.