Are you again arguing that the legal system was NOT duly executed as per Constitution?
You are no better than a pissed off judge. The man was PARDONED, yet you continue to restate some type of lawlessness is still present. IT IS NOT. IT IS OVER
You don't read very well, do you? The issue is what are all the collateral consequences of a pardon, including whether the underlying conviction must be wiped out as if it never happened or not.
None of that is explicit just within the word "pardon" or the Constitution and therefore it must be interpreted. In the first instance, the judge to do that would be this judge. If Arpaio isn't happy with the result, then he can appeal that decision.
If it's as clear and black-and-white as you say, then the court of appeals should have no problem summarily undoing this judges decision.