Author Topic: New water-cooling solar panels could lower the cost of air conditioning by 20%  (Read 662 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,620
Science Mag By Robert F. ServiceSep. 4, 2017

Most of us have heard of solar water heaters. Now there’s a solar water cooler, and the technology may sharply lower the cost of industrial-scale air conditioning and refrigeration.

The new water coolers are panels that sit atop a roof, and they’re made of three components. The first is a plastic layer topped with a silver coating that reflects nearly all incoming sunlight, keeping the panel from heating up in the summer sun. The plastic layer sits atop the second component, a snaking copper tube. Water is piped through the tube, where it sheds heat to the plastic. That heat is then radiated out by the plastic at a wavelength in the middle region of the infrared (IR) spectrum, which is not absorbed by the atmosphere and instead travels all the way to outer space. Finally, the whole panel is encased in a thermally insulating plastic housing that ensures nearly all the heat radiated away comes from the circulating water and not the surrounding air.

Researchers at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, recently placed three water cooling panels—each 0.37 square meters—atop a building on campus and circulated water through them at a rate of 0.2 liters every minute. They report today in Nature Energy that their setup cooled the water as much as 5°C below the ambient temperature over 3 days of testing. They then modeled how their panels would behave if integrated into a typical air conditioning unit for a two-story building in Las Vegas, Nevada. The results: Their setup would lower the building’s air conditioning electrical demand by 21% over the summer.

More: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/09/new-water-cooling-solar-panels-could-lower-cost-air-conditioning-20

Offline GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,016
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
Isn't that exactly what cooling towers and water chillers already do, but better? I never worked with systems for AC, but I have installed fairly large units for laboratories and manufacturing. Exactly how much roof space is going to be left free after all these wonderful solar electric and cooling panels are in place, or will everyone start putting covers over all the parking spaces so as to install panels there?

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,534
Isn't that exactly what cooling towers and water chillers already do, but better? I never worked with systems for AC, but I have installed fairly large units for laboratories and manufacturing. Exactly how much roof space is going to be left free after all these wonderful solar electric and cooling panels are in place, or will everyone start putting covers over all the parking spaces so as to install panels there?

Not quite the same. Cooling towers and water chillers transfer the heat to the atmosphere making the air warmer.  They require the air to be cooler to exchange the heat if truly passive otherwise they use an evaporator adding moisture to drier air and/or use a heat pump that uses substantial energy to move the heat. This on the other hand, if true, radiates the heat to space instead of transferring it to the atmosphere all the while being fully passive. It does so with the atmosphere being warmer than what's being transferred to space with no other energy source to pump it out. That's pretty impressive, if true.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2017, 06:57:07 am by DB »

Offline GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,016
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
Not quite the same. Cooling towers and water chillers transfer the heat to the atmosphere making the air warmer.  They require the air to be cooler to exchange the heat if truly passive otherwise they use an evaporator adding moisture to drier air and/or use a heat pump that uses substantial energy to move the heat. This on the other hand, if true, radiates the heat to space instead of transferring it to the atmosphere all the while being fully passive. It does so with the atmosphere being warmer than what's being transferred to space with no other energy source to pump it out. That's pretty impressive, if true.
I'll take your word for it, the only chillers we dealt with were the evaporative tower type, and they worked pretty darn well using just circulating pumps. But are these panels really any less passive since they still need a circulating pump to move the water, or did I read that wrong?

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,534
I'll take your word for it, the only chillers we dealt with were the evaporative tower type, and they worked pretty darn well using just circulating pumps. But are these panels really any less passive since they still need a circulating pump to move the water, or did I read that wrong?

Moving heated water through it to transfer the heat out of that water is still passive. It behaves just like passing heated water through a radiator but the heat radiated isn't transferred to the air but space instead even at daytime. It can transfer heat even when the heat to be radiated is cooler than the surrounding air temperature which is what is so unique about it. Normally it takes compressors and evaporators/condensers to move heat into a relatively warmer atmosphere.