Author Topic: Five Months Later, Dems Still Can’t Explain ‘Circumstantial Evidence Of Collusion’ Between Trump And Russia  (Read 505 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Five Months Later, Dems Still Can’t Explain ‘Circumstantial Evidence Of Collusion’ Between Trump And Russia

Posted By Kerry Picket On 9:50 PM 07/02/2017 In | No Comments

WASHINGTON–Five months after ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff said that “circumstantial evidence” of collusion influencing the 2016 election existed between Trump campaign associates and Moscow, he and other Democrats on the committee are silent about it or struggle to explain the supposed collusion.

Schiff made his remark on NBC’s “Meet the Press” when confronted with the fact that James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence under President Obama, rejected the idea that any evidence of such collusion happened while he led the U.S. intelligence agencies.

Schiff said at the time: “I was surprised to see Director Clapper say that because I don’t think you can make that claim categorically as he did. I would characterize it this way at the outset of the investigation: There is circumstantial evidence of collusion. There is direct evidence, I think, of deception and that’s where we begin the investigation.”
 

Article printed from The Daily Caller: http://dailycaller.com

URL to article: http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/02/five-months-later-dems-still-cant-explain-circumstantial-evidence-of-collusion-between-trump-and-russia/

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
These investigations have been all hole and no donut.

Offline Snarknado

  • Anti
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,542
They've promised the thugs that make up their base Trump's head on a platter. When they can't deliver, things are going to get ugly...
---
Everything I need to know I learned in GTA

HonestJohn

  • Guest
It's been five months since Mueller's investigation ended?

Who knew?

This looks to be an article trying desperately to bury an investigation before it's even started.