Author Topic: Inside the Army's plan to ditch the M4 and 5.56  (Read 1526 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Inside the Army's plan to ditch the M4 and 5.56
« on: June 28, 2017, 02:48:49 pm »
After carrying the M16 or one of its cousins across the globe for more than half a century, soldiers could get a peek at a new prototype assault rifle that fires a larger round by 2020.

Army researchers are testing half a dozen ammunition variants in “intermediate calibers,” which falls between the current 7.62 mm and 5.56 mm rounds, to create a new light machine gun and inform the next-generation individual assault rifle/round combo.

The weapon designs being tested will be “unconventional,” officials said, and likely not one that is currently commercially available.

Some intermediate calibers being tested include the .260 Remington, 6.5 Creedmoor, .264 USA as well as other non-commercial intermediate calibers, including cased telescoped ammo, Army officials said.

If selected by senior leaders, the weapon could resolve a close-quarters weapons debate about calibers that critics say dates to the 1920s and has influenced military small arms ever since.

If successful, the new rifle and round combination would give troops a weapon they can carry with about the same number of rounds as the current 5.56 mm but with greater range and accuracy in their firepower — with little change in weight.

The new rifle would likely replace the M16/M4 platform, which has been in the hands of troops since the 1960s and undergone multiple modifications and upgrades.

Maj. Jason Bohannon, lethality branch chief at the Army’s Maneuver Center of Excellence at Fort Benning, Georgia, and Matt Walker, deputy director of the branch and a retired command sergeant major, spoke recently to Army Times about broad efforts in small arms weapons research and development.

https://www.armytimes.com/articles/new-rifle-bigger-bullets-inside-the-armys-plan-to-ditch-the-m4-and-556

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline Taxcontrol

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
  • Gender: Male
  • "Stupid should hurt" - Dad's wisdom
Re: Inside the Army's plan to ditch the M4 and 5.56
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2017, 07:44:55 pm »
6.5 Creedmoore Mini-14 with thicker barrel, improved trigger, synthetic stock with collapsible or folding shoulder stock.

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Re: Inside the Army's plan to ditch the M4 and 5.56
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2017, 07:49:54 pm »
6.5 Creedmoore Mini-14 with thicker barrel, improved trigger, synthetic stock with collapsible or folding shoulder stock.

I've heard they are leaning towards the 6.5 Creedmoore.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2017, 07:50:34 pm by txradioguy »
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
Re: Inside the Army's plan to ditch the M4 and 5.56
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2017, 08:03:52 pm »
It used to be said that most firefights were within 300 yards. So now we encounter fights beyond 300 meters. Ya just never know.

The stockpiles of 5.56 and 7.62 shouldn't be  a problem if rear echelon forces are equipped with suitable older weapons while those stockpiles last.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2017, 08:07:08 pm by endicom »

Offline txradioguy

  • Propaganda NCOIC
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,534
  • Gender: Male
  • Rule #39
Re: Inside the Army's plan to ditch the M4 and 5.56
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2017, 08:16:16 pm »
It used to be said that most firefights were within 300 yards. So now we encounter fights beyond 300 meters. Ya just never know.

The stockpiles of 5.56 and 7.62 shouldn't be  a problem if rear echelon forces are equipped with suitable older weapons while those stockpiles last.

I doubt they'll get rid of any 7.62 stockpiles...there are still too many M60 and M240 B machine guns in use with no plans on replacing them...plus the M249 SAW is chambered for the 5.56 as well.

The only weapons system it would affect is the individual soldiers rifle.

« Last Edit: June 28, 2017, 08:17:23 pm by txradioguy »
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Here lies in honored glory an American soldier, known but to God

THE ESTABLISHMENT IS THE PROBLEM...NOT THE SOLUTION

Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!