"Professor Thomas de xira Burton--Assoc Administrator of the Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington . . . asserted that our civilization is on the verge of discovering evidence of alien life in the cosmos ... we are on the verge of making one of the most profound unprecedented discoveries in history . . ."
I have heard that "on the verge" for many years. Get back to me when there is actually proof, such as an actual creature one can see.
You are truly a very brilliant woman. However, I still don't think the quantity nor the quality of your research are quite up to your level of brilliance.
Yes . . . I've followed that 'false hope' sequence of predicted disclosure for decades.
However, the quantity and quality of disclosure HAS increased markedly over the years--particularly in the last 5. I don't understand that not registering on your constructions on reality.
Also:
"Dr Brian O'Leary--a former NASA astronaut & Princeton physics professor..."there is abundant evidence that we are being contacted...that civilizations have been monitoring us for a very long time ... that their appearance is bizarre from any type of traditional materialistic ...Western point of view ..."
That is bunk - we haven't contacted anyone and we have no idea what they would look like if they were there. "their appearance is bizarre". He can't know that since there aren't any.
Uhhhhh . . . I disagree. There is just far too much evidence to the contrary. William Tompkins and others who have worked many decades in the thick of the black projects which involved the critters and their technologies document rather fiercely the opposite of your perspective.
There's actually considerable evidence that the Nazi's in Germany were in a working dialogue and collaboration at least as early as the 1920's.
I don't understand how you can just sweep such large piles of evidence into the trash so glibly.
I am not a novice when it comes to the possibility of extra terrestrial life. I have read about it much of my life. I have every book written about the Roswell, New Mexico, event. I studied that one in detail. I have been there and gone through their museum about the event. I have a copy of the Roswell newspaper that was printed then. I have read everything that was ever printed and available to the public about that. Now, those creatures were supposed to be little gray men. We do know the military airbase there was involved in that. I would take the Roswell "evidence" more than these men now saying "We are on the verge..." So, little gray men it is, until there is actually a real one seen now and I want pictures or a real body, not just someone saying he saw "x".
.
I think I understand your perspective though I do not understand how it survives so much evidence to the contrary.
The topic is incredibly massive and complex.
However, the amount of evidence quite solid enough to convict most murderers in most courts has been piling up to huge degrees the last decade plus.
The last year has seen very significant iterative escalations in the amount and quality of disclosure evidence and of the sources it originates with.
Yet, your perspective and stance have remained unmoved. That's more than a little puzzling, to me.
Sometimes, I wonder if the distortions beliefs can have on perception may be at play.
I started out in 1962 letting the evidence--of all qualities--distill however it would--and I held most hypotheses quite loosely.
Very slowly over the decades since, some things have become more and more convincing or even distilled out as highly likely to definitely true. That's been true, for me, from merely following the data wherever it led.
