Amazing this was in
The Atlantic. They are right...
“The 1967 war was the most consequential and impactful of the conflicts between Israel and the Arabs.”
I agree that the 1948 war was.
“There were very real and missed opportunities for Arab-Israeli agreements in the wake of the war.”
Again, I agree that this is a myth. This quote sums it up well...
Even if the Israeli offer had been concretized, it would have faced impossible odds. Egypt’s launching its war of attrition and the public hardening of Arabs’ attitudes seemed to make any serious process impossible. The Arabs’ three no’s at the Khartoum summit of August 1967—no peace; no negotiation; no recognition—seemed to sum up the impasse . . .
“The war was an unmitigated disaster for the Palestinians.”
Again, the myth is correctly refuted. For example:
And Palestinians would begin to make the transition from hapless refugees in the 1940s and 1950s to terrorists and guerrillas during the 1960s and 1970s to political interlocutors by the 1980s.
“The 1967 war was a catastrophe for peacemaking.”
They pop this myth easily, too. The Arabs wanted Israel destroyed. There would have been peace without the Six-Day War only if Israel was eliminated.
“Fifty years later, Arabs, Israelis and Palestinians are ready to solve the conflict.”