Speculation Swirls as Sean Hannity Announces Sudden Vacation Amid Fox News Turmoil

[Oceander]

In other words there simply no way to ever prove this wasn't a conspiracy in your eyes.

Which is all the more "proof" that it's really a DNC/Clinton conspiracy!

[Silver Pines]

Locked in 3, 2, 1....

[Oceander]

See.  I did help.

And by the way...

you have no idea how funny you are to me.  Funny and obvious.

 

[Oceander]

Locked in 3, 2, 1....

Awww, party pooper!

[XenaLee]

In other words there simply no way to ever prove this wasn't a conspiracy in your eyes.

How really dense can some folks (the "ilk" folks....lololol) be?

Further investigation is needed.  Period.  Without that, it's still an unsolved murder and still a mystery.

[roamer_1]

I'm not the one mocking and boorishly insulting anyone of my ""ilk"" that wants to see this investigated further.   That would be you....

Hold on now... I don't know of anyone here who says to sweep this under the rug. Show me where anyone said not to investigate this further. What everyone is saying is that there is no there there.
Your exuberant defense is misplaced until there is evidence to back it up.
That's what folks are saying.

I think some here are just offended when fomenting anger doesn't work... When it doesn't justify jumping on the Trump train... Sorry. Fighting liberals in defense of liberals really ain't my bag. I've got no dog in this hunt... So I ain't gonna get all excited about it any which way.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

How really dense can some folks (the "ilk" folks....lololol) be?

Further investigation is needed.  Period.  Without that, it's still an unsolved murder and still a mystery.

And the police are currently investigating, so what are you getting your panties in a bunch for?

[Oceander]

How really dense can some folks (the "ilk" folks....lololol) be?

Further investigation is needed.  Period.  Without that, it's still an unsolved murder and still a mystery.

Finally, a smidge of reason from you.  Yes, it is an unsolved murder.  But that does not make it a Clinton/DNC hit job, and what you've been arguing for here all along is that it was a Clinton/DNC hit job.  Are you now giving up on that claim?

[Silver Pines]

Awww, party pooper!

Hey, I can't lock anything, I'm just predicting!  Lol

[Oceander]

Hold on now... I don't know of anyone here who says to sweep this under the rug. Show me where anyone said not to investigate this further. What everyone is saying is that there is no there there.
Your exuberant defense is misplaced until there is evidence to back it up.
That's what folks are saying.

I think some here are just offended when fomenting anger doesn't work... When it doesn't justify jumping on the Trump train... Sorry. Fighting liberals in defense of liberals really ain't my bag. I've got no dog in this hunt... So I ain't gonna get all excited about it any which way.

[mystery-ak]

Not saying the whole PD is involved...just one bigwig can shut it all down.

botched robbery...then why didn't they rob him after he was shot....like to see the police report...

[XenaLee]

Finally, a smidge of reason from you.  Yes, it is an unsolved murder.  But that does not make it a Clinton/DNC hit job, and what you've been arguing for here all along is that it was a Clinton/DNC hit job.  Are you now giving up on that claim?

Where, exactly, did I claim that?  Can you link me to it?  Cause I really don't remember specifically saying it.   Link, please?

[mystery-ak]

Hey, I can't lock anything, I'm just predicting!  Lol

I hate it when they do that...

[Oceander]

Not saying the whole PD is involved...just one bigwig can shut it all down.

botched robbery...then why didn't they rob him after he was shot....like to see the police report...

Because that is the nature of a botched robbery.  The robber probably had no intention of shooting the guy and then, when things got out of hand and the gun went off, the robber took off immediately.  A robber doesn't shoot first and then scavenge the corpse; a robber typically uses a weapon as a bluff to get the victim to hand his goods over willingly; it's when that bluff gets called that things go south.

[roamer_1]

Oh please.   Like suddenly, you aren't aware of the possibility (more like probability) that the DC police might be compromised by the left.... just like other areas of government.

Who the hell do you think you're fooling here?

SO WHAT? Who takes it over then. The FBI? What if they say there's nothing there? Will you believe THEM? And why? Their credibility is just as questionable and political these days...
How does this end without evidence?

[Oceander]

Where, exactly, did I claim that?  Can you link me to it?  Cause I really don't remember specifically saying it.   Link, please?

That's the side you adopted when you launched yourself into this discussion.  That, or you simply chose to argue against me because you dislike me personally.

[Oceander]

SO WHAT? Who takes it over then. The FBI? What if they say there's nothing there? Will you believe THEM? And why? Their credibility is just as questionable and political these days...
How does this end without evidence?

They'd just claim the FBI was bought out by the DNC/Clinton cabal then.

[XenaLee]

That's the side you adopted when you launched yourself into this discussion.  That, or you simply chose to argue against me because you dislike me personally.

You flatter yourself.  And.... your attempt to assign words to me that I never posted has been duly noted.  You're dishonest, IOW.

Got it.

[Oceander]

You flatter yourself.  And.... your attempt to assign words to me that I never posted has been duly noted.  You're dishonest, IOW.

Got it.

Then why the hell were you arguing against those of us whose only "sin" was saying we wanted to see some facts instead of Hannity's asinine DNC/Clinton conspiracy theories?

[XenaLee]

Because that is the nature of a botched robbery.  The robber probably had no intention of shooting the guy and then, when things got out of hand and the gun went off, the robber took off immediately.  A robber doesn't shoot first and then scavenge the corpse; a robber typically uses a weapon as a bluff to get the victim to hand his goods over willingly; it's when that bluff gets called that things go south.

I find it hard to believe that a robber would shoot someone IN THE BACK after failing to rob the person.  How often does that happen?  Got any stats to back that up?

[mystery-ak]

I find it hard to believe that a robber would shoot someone IN THE BACK after failing to rob the person.  How often does that happen?  Got any stats to back that up?

He was shot in the back?..was he trying to run away?...sure would like to see that report.

[XenaLee]

Then why the hell were you arguing against those of us whose only "sin" was saying we wanted to see some facts instead of Hannity's asinine DNC/Clinton conspiracy theories?

All I ever argued here was for further investigation.   

After the BS and harassment from your (dare I say it?  I dare.  I dare) "ilk" here that served only to mock me for wanting further investigation...

I dug in.

Sue me.   

[Oceander]

I find it hard to believe that a robber would shoot someone IN THE BACK after failing to rob the person.  How often does that happen?  Got any stats to back that up?

Really?  The robber, who has no intention of actually shooting anyone, holds the gun to the guy's back and says "give me your wallet."  The guy sasses back, the robber gets ticked off, loses it, and pops off a few rounds - unless the gun was a single-action revolver with a heavy trigger, it's very easy for it to get away from you - and then suddenly realizes that he just stepped into the big leagues; he's not a robber - a mere thief - anymore, he's now a murderer.  The adrenaline pumps and he takes off for the hills.  It would take more ice-water in your veins to stop and pick over the still-warm corpse than to just take off in panic.

Pretty easy, and pretty common.

[XenaLee]

He was shot in the back?..was he trying to run away?...sure would like to see that report.

Yeah.   Shot twice in the back.   Does that sound like a "botched robbery" to you?  I'd like to see some stats on how often that happens in "botched robberies".

[Oceander]

Yeah.   Shot twice in the back.   Does that sound like a "botched robbery" to you?  I'd like to see some stats on how often that happens in "botched robberies".

It sounds exactly like a botched robbery to me.  In fact, it sounds like nothing else but.