So the 2nd person running who would fight back was....?
Incidental. It is the principles he stood upon that matter, and a long record guaranteeing that his endorsement of those principles was not mere campaign promises.
But apparently, god is in need of you to defend her, right?
@mystery-ak , turn me loose.
I could say precisely the same of you, with every bit as much validity.
No, you cannot, actually.
make an argument that is based in reason and intellect. An argument that is logically conclusive, supported by some kind of evidence and can stand of its own rationale....
I have all the way along.
You will not get a roaring economy from a big-spending government. Diametrically opposed things.
You will not get a smaller government from a NY city liberal - Also diametrically opposed - You will get more government, and more spending.
You will not get meaningful reduction in collusion from a crony capitalist.
You will not get meaningful, lasting peace without repentance.
You cannot reduce the welfare state without reducing bastard children and one parent households.
You cannot reduce crime without reducing the amount of young men without fathers.
You will not have honest reporting and statistics, or even reasonable science, without the re-establishment of honor and merit.
and on and on it goes.