Exactly. This knee jerk practice of yelling "fake news" because we don't like the source or the POV excludes thought. It's precisely what TOS does, and it's based on emotion and tribalism.
It's absolutely true that many in the media want Trump taken down, but that doesn't mean every single thing written is completely false. Sometimes they get things right. We ought to wait and let the facts come out before dismissing every damn thing we don't like. If something really is fake news, it'll be revealed.
Exactly WHAT SOURCE?! Please CRITICALLY read the article in its entirety. It only took me half way to break apart this garbage. I'll point out the quotes from the article below with my commentary and I hope you reach the same conclusion that a high schooler could do better than a propagandist media.
So I'm going to ask the obvious question if anyone actually CRITICALLY reads any of the absolute garbage word for word his rag publishes? And when I say word for word I mean critically think of every word chosen. Here's a start and this didn't take me long to grab these snippets and I only got half way through the article.
"according to current and former U.S. officials"
Translation: democrat members of the senate intelligence committee
"officials said."
Random democratic Congress critters
"provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement"
A UN ally in cahoots with the socialist arm of our government and Pravda media looking to take down our duly elected president through constant innuendo. Did you watch the presser last night?
"The partner had not given the United States permission to share the material with Russia"
Oh those pesky Russians again! And who is this mystery partner
"officials said Trump’s decision to do so endangers cooperation from an ally"
Democrat members again from the Senate intelligence committee leaking garbage to the press to continue stoking the fire to overthrow our President
"senior White House officials took steps to contain the damage"
Career Obamabot bureaucrats
"This is code-word information,” said a U.S. official familiar with the matter"
Another U.S. official in other words a Democrat
"It was during that meeting, officials said, that Trump went off script"
Not what McMaster said at the presser yesterday who was at the meeting but hey let's not deal with pesky details such as this
"McMaster reiterated his statement in a subsequent appearance at the White House on Monday and described the Washington Post story as “false,” but did not take any questions"
"It is all kind of shocking,” said a former senior U.S. official who is close to current administration officials"
Hahahaha! This one is HILARIOUS! Hell this could be Susan Rice and Chuck Schumer for all we know!!
This article is the BIGGEST bucket of horse manure I've ever read and I ONLY got half way through it! Why do critical readers not critically think and digest what it is they are reading and I'm not a 100% Trump fan either. I support misty of his policies but not all.