Harvard trained immunologist demolishes California legislation that terminates vaccine exemptions {a VERY crucial article for every parent, imho}

[Quix]

.
NOTE: THIS is the NEXUSNEWSFEED.COM link. The source link triggers a VIPRE warning that the site might damage my computer so I'm going with the safe NEXUS link here:
.
https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/harvard-trained-immunologist-demolishes-california-legislation-that-terminates-vaccine-exemptions
.

The following open letter by a PhD Immunologist completely demolishes the current California legislative initiative to remove all vaccine exemptions. That such a draconian and cynical state statute is under consideration in the ‘Golden State’ is as shocking as it is predictable.  After all, it was mysteriously written and submitted shortly after the manufactured-in-Disneyland measles ‘outbreak’.
.

The indisputable science that is employed by Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD ought to be read by every CA legislator who is entertaining an affirmative vote for SB277.  Dr. Obukhanych skillfully deconstructs the many false and fabricated arguments that are advanced by Big Pharma and the U.S Federal Government as they attempt to implement a nationwide Super-Vaccination agenda.
.
. . .

It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the public, and this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by federal and state legislators country-wide. You should be aware that the nature of protection afforded by many modern vaccines – and that includes most of the vaccines recommended by the CDC for children – is not consistent with such a statement. I have outlined below the recommended vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases. People who have not received the vaccines mentioned below pose no higher threat to the general public than those who have, implying that discrimination against non-immunized children in a public school setting may not be warranted.
.

• Tetanus is not a contagious disease, but rather acquired from deep-puncture wounds contaminated with C. tetani spores. Vaccinating for tetanus (via the DTaP combination vaccine) cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is intended to render personal protection only.
• .

• While intended to prevent the disease-causing effects of the diphtheria toxin, the diphtheria toxoid vaccine (also contained in the DTaP vaccine) is not designed to prevent colonization and transmission of C. diphtheriae. Vaccinating for diphtheria cannot alter the safety of public spaces; it is likewise intended for personal protection only.
• .

• The acellular pertussis (aP) vaccine (the final element of the DTaP combined vaccine), now in use in the USA, replaced the whole cell pertussis vaccine in the late 1990s, which was followed by an unprecedented resurgence of whooping cough. An experiment with deliberate pertussis infection in primates revealed that the aP vaccine is not capable of preventing colonization and transmission of B. pertussis (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #2). The FDA has issued a warning regarding this crucial finding.[1]
• .

• Furthermore, the 2013 meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors at the CDC revealed additional alarming data that pertussis variants (PRN-negative strains) currently circulating in the USA acquired a selective advantage to infect those who are up-to-date for their DTaP boosters (see appendix for the CDC document, Item #3), meaning that people who are up-to-date are more likely to be infected, and thus contagious, than people who are not vaccinated.
• .

• Among numerous types of H. influenzae, the Hib vaccine covers only type b. Despite its sole intention to reduce symptomatic and asymptomatic (disease-less) Hib carriage, the introduction of the Hib vaccine has inadvertently shifted strain dominance towards other types of H. influenzae (types a through f).These types have been causing invasive disease of high severity and increasing incidence in adults in the era of Hib vaccination of children (see appendix for the scientific study, Item #4).  The general population is more vulnerable to the invasive disease now than it was prior to the start of the Hib vaccination campaign.  Discriminating against children who are not vaccinated for Hib does not make any scientific sense in the era of non-type b H. influenzae disease.
• .

• Hepatitis B is a blood-borne virus. It does not spread in a community setting, especially among children who are unlikely to engage in high-risk behaviors, such as needle sharing or sex. Vaccinating children for hepatitis B cannot significantly alter the safety of public spaces. Further, school admission is not prohibited for children who are chronic hepatitis B carriers. To prohibit school admission for those who are simply unvaccinated – and do not even carry hepatitis B – would constitute unreasonable and illogical discrimination.
• .

In summary, a person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, and Hib vaccines due to reasons of conscience poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is.  No discrimination is warranted.
.
. . .

Measles research scientists have for a long time been aware of the “measles paradox.” I quote from the article by Poland & Jacobson (1994) “Failure to Reach the Goal of Measles Elimination: Apparent Paradox of Measles Infections in Immunized Persons.” Arch Intern Med 154:1815-1820:
.

“The apparent paradox is that as measles immunization rates rise to high levels in a population, measles becomes a disease of immunized persons.”[2]
.

Further research determined that behind the “measles paradox” is a fraction of the population called LOW VACCINE RESPONDERS. Low-responders are those who respond poorly to the first dose of the measles vaccine. These individuals then mount a weak immune response to subsequent RE-vaccination and quickly return to the pool of “susceptibles’’ within 2-5 years, despite being fully vaccinated.[3]
.

Re-vaccination cannot correct low-responsiveness: it appears to be an immuno-genetic trait.[4]  The proportion of low-responders among children was estimated to be 4.7% in the USA.[5]
.

Studies of measles outbreaks in Quebec, Canada, and China attest that outbreaks of measles still happen, even when vaccination compliance is in the highest bracket (95-97% or even 99%, see appendix for scientific studies, Items #6&7). This is because even in high vaccine responders, vaccine-induced antibodies wane over time.  Vaccine immunity does not equal life-long immunity acquired after natural exposure.
.
. . .
In summary: 1) due to the properties of modern vaccines, non-vaccinated individuals pose no greater risk of transmission of polio, diphtheria, pertussis, and numerous non-type b H. influenzae strains than vaccinated individuals do, non-vaccinated individuals pose virtually no danger of transmission of hepatitis B in a school setting, and tetanus is not transmissible at all; 2) there is a significantly elevated risk of emergency room visits after childhood vaccination appointments attesting that vaccination is  not risk-free; 3) outbreaks of measles cannot be entirely prevented even if we had nearly perfect vaccination compliance; and 4) an effective method of preventing measles and other viral diseases in vaccine-ineligible infants and the immunocompromised, immunoglobulin, is available for those who may be exposed to these diseases.
.
. . .

.
I certainly agree that legislators supporting such globalist hideousness as such legislation deserve to be tried and sentenced as criminals.
.
 Avoiding Truth
.
There is a principle
__Which is a bar against all information,
____Which is proof against all argument,
______And which cannot fail to keep man in everlasting ignorance.
________That principle is condemnation before investigation
--Edmund Spencer
 
GOP BRIEFING ROOM ‘ALTERNATE REALITIES’ PING LIST
@bigheadfred
@Cyber Liberty
@DCPatriot
@Freya
@Ghost Bear
@GrannyMinimum
@Idaho_Cowboy
@jedidah
@Liberty Tree Dr
@Mom MD
@mrpotatohead

 @roamer_1
@Smokin Joe
@Texas Yellow Rose
@the_doc
@Victoria33
@WorkingClassFilth
 

[Smokin Joe]

@Quix it isn't about what is or isn't actually "safe", it is the perception of safety that matters.

If Americans hadn't been scientifically dumbed down to accept the AGW/Climate Change myths so the governments of the planet could grab more power and money and control, they would be scientifically literate  enough to understand that there are limits, and those are laid out in the article. They might also understand the concept of 'herd immunity', and reduced transmission rates, as well as the hazards created by squalenes and other vaccine additives.

Interesting that anaphylactic shock related to peanuts increased in frequency, and possibly severity after peanut oil was used as a squalene in vaccines.

This is a decision that parents should make after hearing the pros and cons from their doctors. That includes the HPV vaccine, too, being touted as a cervical cancer vaccine.

[Quix]

I strongly agree.

THX THX

@Quix it isn't about what is or isn't actually "safe", it is the perception of safety that matters.

If Americans hadn't been scientifically dumbed down to accept the AGW/Climate Change myths so the governments of the planet could grab more power and money and control, they would be scientifically literate  enough to understand that there are limits, and those are laid out in the article. They might also understand the concept of 'herd immunity', and reduced transmission rates, as well as the hazards created by squalenes and other vaccine additives.

Interesting that anaphylactic shock related to peanuts increased in frequency, and possibly severity after peanut oil was used as a squalene in vaccines.

This is a decision that parents should make after hearing the pros and cons from their doctors. That includes the HPV vaccine, too, being touted as a cervical cancer vaccine.

[Idaho_Cowboy]

Thanks @Quix
I think it real funny the knee jerk reaction to questioning any vaccine. Questioning what food you eat doesn't make you in favor of starvation, but questioning any one vaccine means you want to return to the stone age.

[driftdiver]

@Quix it isn't about what is or isn't actually "safe", it is the perception of safety that matters.

@Smokin Joe
its about control, IMO.   

[Quix]

INDEED. Sanity has been tossed aside by one of the oligarchy's most effective tools--ridicule. They've used it well for more than 60 years in the UFO field.

Thanks @Quix
I think it real funny the knee jerk reaction to questioning any vaccine. Questioning what food you eat doesn't make you in favor of starvation, but questioning any one vaccine means you want to return to the stone age.