Regardless, the key point is the distribution of whatever was collected. Recall that one of Obama's parting gifts was a large expansion of the agencies who get to routinely look at raw data.
Perhaps that expansion had good intent and envisioned a good result. But, it surely can be seized on by those with nefarious intent, as has obviously transpired.
From the article: "Nunes later told reporters at the White House that he believes the details should "bother" the president and his team because some of the collection seemed 'inappropriate.'" I don't know what that means, exactly, since Nunes said that "he believes the information was all collected legally." Is he talking about the nature of the information, or about the manner in which it was collected?
Hello Ben Rhodes.
Pathetic. Unfortunately, I've learned to expect no better from you, don.
