BREAKING>>>>Nunes: Intel community surveiled Trump transition officials

[Emjay]

I have absolutely no doubt that Obama was behind it.  He may not have officially ordered it, but his fellow leftists know exactly what he wants them to do.  They don't even have to ask.  They just do it.

There's something vulcanish about Obama and not in a good way.  Maybe he has them in a mind meld.

[Smokin Joe]

Can we get the list updated, for yet another #nevertrump failure ?

Failure will fit in a tweet. Why not thumb that in like the guy who failed to clean house in the agencies and let his AG be hobbled by promises of recusal without a backup. Now he can't clean house at the DOJ or the other agencies because of an "ongoing investigation".

Six dimensional chess, indeed.

In the meantime, the optics suck, equities took a dump, and there isn't any wall, ban, and obammy care is still the law of the land. Just Yuuuge. 

[corbe]

What are you talking about? I didn't say anything. Did someone say I said something? What did they hear? Whatever they said they are outright lies.

BTW, who is saying this stuff? You can tell me.

   You're not authorized @Frank Cannon  only subscribers of 'Ted Cruz's Insider Scoop' newsletter can be validated for such disclosure.

[Emjay]

Not really, since I'm one of the detractors and the word 'all' was used in the original post.  Also, I doubt I'm alone.

You're going to have to explain.  It's all been so long ago.

[Smokin Joe]

Nunes went out of his way to say that Trump was not deliberately targeted in the reports he's talking about here.

Well, if they weren't targeting the Russians, and they weren't targeting Trump, why were they listening in? Who were they targeting?

[Smokin Joe]

"Incidental" is the word of the day.
 
It was just 'incidental' that information was covertly collected on a private US citizen (who happened to be running for president) and distributed among intelligence agencies (per a brand new rule that allowed such a distribution), to be illegally leaked to the press, who 'incidentally' used the info to buttress a charge which 'incidentally' supported the core strategy against candidate mentioned above.

Yep. Pure coinkydink. 

[Cyber Liberty]

   You're not authorized @Frank Cannon  only subscribers of 'Ted Cruz's Insider Scoop' newsletter can be validated for such disclosure.

That's BS, anybody who can afford to buy a knock-off Secret Decoder Ring from Crackerjack can get in.

 

[XenaLee]

There's something vulcanish about Obama and not in a good way.  Maybe he has them in a mind meld.

They're leftists.  And like the Borg.... they all "think" alike. 

[Emjay]

They're leftists.  And like the Borg.... they all "think" alike.

Just saw that nasty little twerp Schiff claim that Nunes is acting as a 'surrogate' to Trump.

Does anyone know if that cord that was attached permanently to Schiff with the other end in Obama's hand ... has that ever been cut or did it just move down the street to the new 'white house.'

[truth_seeker]

      If your opinion was not valued here by others and the owners they would have canned your a$$ a long time ago.   

I have no idea if I am valued, but the owner claims nobody gets the zot here, for posting an opinion.

 

[DiogenesLamp]

What's scaring me is that you think Nunes is talking about "reverse targeting" when he clearly is not.  "Incidental information" has a specific meaning, and it's not equal to "reverse targeting."

It isn't when you are dealing with an ethical and moral administration.   Snake Obama and his Chicago Mafia mentality do not rate such purity of motives.   

Chicago Mafia Obama has no scruples about misusing the powers of law enforcement.   I have no doubt he wouldn't hesitate an instant to engage in criminal behavior.   


He will do "reverse targeting"  and call it "incidental collection."   He will just "incidental collect" information on everyone surrounding his target.

Words have meaning.  It's important to use them precisely and correctly.

Words have no particular meaning when greasy con-men like Obama use them to get around the law.   

[endicom]

I have no idea if I am valued...

They told me to try Dollar Tree.

[Cyber Liberty]

I have no idea if I am valued, but the owner claims nobody gets the zot here, for posting an opinion.

Did somebody get deleted for posting an opinion? 

[corbe]

I have no idea if I am valued, but the owner claims nobody gets the zot here, for posting an opinion.

 

@truth_seeker

   I've seen banishment/timeouts, particularly during the election, as you know it got quite heated here on multiple nights.
   But a minuscule compared to TOS, ever considered how long some of our members would last over there for just expressing their opinion, me included?

[Emjay]

@truth_seeker

   I've seen banishment/timeouts, particularly during the election, as you know it got quite heated here on multiple nights.
   But a minuscule compared to TOS, ever considered how long some of our members would last over there for just expressing their opinion, me included?

I was spoken to sharply but I deserved it.

[Smokin Joe]

@truth_seeker

   I've seen banishment/timeouts, particularly during the election, as you know it got quite heated here on multiple nights.
   But a minuscule compared to TOS, ever considered how long some of our members would last over there for just expressing their opinion, me included?

I didn't give the place (TOS) the satisfaction of kicking me out. i was already looking for someplace new when I got an invite to come here. I just left.  The biggie here is to attack the arguments and not the poster.

[DB]

It means Trump was sorta right.....

Rush discussing this now

Or it means someone's floating a story that no one can confirm or deny to make Trump sorta of right... Who really knows...

[corbe]

I was spoken to sharply but I deserved it.

@Emjay A lot of us felt the heat from myst, in our passion we forget sometimes we are merely guests here.

[DB]

I didn't give the place (TOS) the satisfaction of kicking me out. i was already looking for someplace new when I got an invite to come here. I just left.  The biggie here is to attack the arguments and not the poster.

Same here.

[Cyber Liberty]

I didn't give the place (TOS) the satisfaction of kicking me out. i was already looking for someplace new when I got an invite to come here. I just left.  The biggie here is to attack the arguments and not the poster.

A lot of lifelines went out in those days.  "The Lounge" was the "FR Refugee Thread."  There are some folks who never forgave that.

[corbe]

A lot of lifelines went out in those days.  "The Lounge" was the "FR Refugee Thread."  There are some folks who never forgave that.

   I think it was @pookie18 that brought me over with the Toones, still the best.

[Smokin Joe]

A lot of lifelines went out in those days.  "The Lounge" was the "FR Refugee Thread."  There are some folks who never forgave that.

Maybe, but I was in early and saw a lot of survivors come in, lots of familiar faces, too, and we'd all felt run out of there (or been banned) for the same basic reasons: For pointing out foibles and inconsistencies which persist even now where we saw them. Many of us had been there 15+ years and were spitting mad at the whole deal, but it was an eye opener, too--and that of itself is never comfortable.

[Frank Cannon]

I have no idea if I am valued, but the owner claims nobody gets the zot here, for posting an opinion.

Bullshit. I posted some opinions here and I got Zotted. I haven't been able to post anything here in almost 3 years.

[corbe]

Bullshit. I posted some opinions here and I got Zotted. I haven't been able to post anything here in almost 3 years.

   I still think you're married to someone high up here or blackmailing them @Frank Cannon

[Frank Cannon]

   I still think you're married to someone high up here or blackmailing them @Frank Cannon

I would give you an indignant wise assed response to that, but like I said in a previous post I am banned from posting here.