Author Topic: SpaceX Goes Head to Head With Boeing and Lockheed -- and Crushes the Competition  (Read 1566 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,544
The Motley Fool 3/19/2017 by Rich Smith

Six months ago, David met Goliath. Six months later, Goliath is getting carried away on his shield.

This contest began last August, with tiny SpaceX going up against United Launch Alliance (ULA), the giant space venture jointly operated by Boeing (NYSE:BA) and Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT), in a critical contest to see who would launch the U.S. Air Force's next "GPS III" satellite.

A bit of history

Historically, ULA had provided monopoly service to the U.S. Air Force on its large satellite launches. But the Air Force had recently certified SpaceX to bid on its contracts -- and compete with ULA. SpaceX parlayed that certification into one GPS III contract win in May 2016, when a legislative snafu in Congress temporarily deprived ULA of access to the engines it needed to launch its rockets, handing the contract to SpaceX by default. But freshly restocked with new engines from Russia, ULA had no intention of allowing SpaceX to beat it in a real contest on a second GPS III contract.

Both companies submitted their best bids to the Air Force -- and as we learned this week, SpaceX won.

The news broke with a whisper on Tuesday, when buried in the Pentagon's daily digest of contract awards came a statement that SpaceX had been awarded the Air Force's second contract "to deliver a GPS III satellite to its intended orbit." The Air Force referred to Boeing and Lockheed's bid only obliquely, noting that "two offers [were] received" for the work, but that SpaceX's bid had won.
How SpaceX won

How did SpaceX win the contract? As with the first GPS award last summer, price appears to have been dispositive. As you may recall, in the May 2016 award, the Air Force had expected to pay about $140 million for the first GPS III launch, and was surprised when SpaceX offered to put its satellite in orbit for "40% less" (or $82.7 million).

This time around, SpaceX bid a bit higher -- $96.5 million. In so doing, SpaceX built an extra $14 million or so worth of profit on its bid. But it appears there was still no contest between the two bids.

After all, by its own admission, the best price ULA can offer for a low-end Atlas V mission is about $200 million -- $164 million for the launch, plus a portion of its standard $1 billion-a-year retainer fee prorated and attributed to the mission. Even after its latest markup, though, SpaceX beat that price by half.

More: https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/03/19/spacex-goes-head-to-head-with-boeing-and-lockheed.aspx?yptr=yahoo

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
Competition is good.

Offline r9etb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,467
  • Gender: Male
Competition is good.

So is getting your national asset into space in one piece.

The price difference between SpaceX and ULA is primarily due to test and verification processes.  Take that for what it's worth.


Offline sneakypete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 52,963
  • Twitter is for Twits
Competition is good.

@endicom

ESPECIALLY when it comes to awarding goobermint contracts and spending taxpayer dollars.
Anyone who isn't paranoid in 2021 just isn't thinking clearly!

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
@endicom

ESPECIALLY when it comes to awarding goobermint contracts and spending taxpayer dollars.


The competition of the 1950s gave us wonders like X-15 and SR-71. I'll take a second helping of that, please.

@sneakypete
« Last Edit: March 21, 2017, 12:51:27 am by endicom »

Offline r9etb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,467
  • Gender: Male
The competition of the 1950s gave us wonders like X-15 and SR-71. I'll take a second helping of that, please.

Huh?

Those came straight from the "Military/Industrial Complex"....

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
Huh?

Those came straight from the "Military/Industrial Complex"....


You are a tad confused.

Offline sneakypete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 52,963
  • Twitter is for Twits
Huh?

Those came straight from the "Military/Industrial Complex"....

@r9etb

Only the contract/money. The goobermint put out a contract telling the bidding companies what the requirements were,and industry came up with designs and costs to submit as bids.

I THINK it was Lockheed that won the bid to build the SR-71 Blackbird,and that thing was truly a marvel of engineering.

BTW,what do you think the Military/Industrial Complex is,other than something evil?
« Last Edit: March 21, 2017, 03:34:53 am by sneakypete »
Anyone who isn't paranoid in 2021 just isn't thinking clearly!

Offline endicom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,113
@r9etb

Only the contract/money. The goobermint put out a contract telling the bidding companies what the requirements were,and industry came up with designs and costs to submit as bids.

I THINK it was Lockheed that won the bid to build the SR-71 Blackbird,and that thing was truly a marvel of engineering.

BTW,what do you think the Military/Industrial Complex is,other than something evil?


There was Lockheed, Martin, Northrop, North American Aviation, Grumman, Fairchild, Boeing, Douglas, Hughes, McDonnell and others. There was competition.

Offline sneakypete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 52,963
  • Twitter is for Twits

There was Lockheed, Martin, Northrop, North American Aviation, Grumman, Fairchild, Boeing, Douglas, Hughes, McDonnell and others. There was competition.

@endicom

Competition is good. There should be more of it.
Anyone who isn't paranoid in 2021 just isn't thinking clearly!