Just the opposite. Much to the chagrin of some on both sides, this is a free site which means that pro and against and everything in between can post their opinions and put them up in the marketplace of ideas. They should just be ready to defend them. Even though some have demanded FR type censorship, the site's owner has chosen the path of freedom over singular orthodoxy.
Agreed! If someone posts the article the article can be dissected, vivisected, torn apart. We will know what is being said, and we will have whatever rebuttal exists, well hashed over and sourced.
Attack someone who posts articles the rest of the world is reading, and no one will post them so we can tear them apart and we'll all have a nice, padded-cell echo chamber.
@don-oDoes
@Weird Tolkienish Figure (or anyone else, for that matter except card carrying Trumpkins) have to post a disclaimer that:
The opinions of the article author are the opinions of the author and not necessarily those of the poster who has provided them for entertainment/discussion purposes
?
Talk about snowflakes. If the article is bogus, attack that, attack the content, the lies, the author, the publishing source. Have at!
Be thankful someone provided it for your continued enjoyment and leave the poster out of it.