Why did the Liberal Media Avoid Referencing Black Lives Matter by Name in Describing Spike in Anti-Police Ambush Attacks?

[rangerrebew]

 Why did the Liberal Media Avoid Referencing Black Lives Matter by Name in Describing Spike in Anti-Police Ambush Attacks?
by Spencer Irvine on December 30, 2016
Print:
  Share:

The question remains, what does the liberal media have to hide about the spike in anti-police officer shootings by not referencing the anti-police rhetoric of Black Lives Matter? For example, the ambush attack suspect in Dallas, Texas supported Black Lives Matter rhetoric and used it to fuel his ambush attack that killed five police officers.

But, the liberal media is not admitting what is true: Black Lives Matter rhetoric has been used to rationalize violence against police officers. A USA Today article avoids naming Black Lives Matter, for example:

    An ambush is generally referred to as an attack that takes place by surprise or from a concealed position. Two other serious examples of such assaults this year include:

http://www.aim.org/don-irvine-blog/flashback-democratic-pollster-pat-caddell-called-the-media-the-enemy-of-the-american-people-in-2012-video/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AccuracyInMedia+%28Accuracy+In+Media%29

[geronl]

Why do some attribute every crime by blacks to Black Lives Matter?
Where is BLM headquarters anyway? How many members does it have? Who are the elected organization officers?