Author Topic: The Judiciary Has No Business Second Guessing National Security Issues  (Read 394 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
 The Judiciary Has No Business Second Guessing National Security Issues

By Dan Cadman, February 8, 2017

 

Yesterday, February 7, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in the government's appeal to overturn a decision by a U.S. District Court judge in Washington State to impose a "temporary" restraining order on the executive order putting a 90-day timeout on visas for aliens from certain designated high-risk nations.

Unusually, the entire hearing was live-streamed. According to the Daily Caller, the government's attorney, August Flentje, "argued that, absent the order, the U.S. was at risk of terrorist attack. [Circuit Court Judges] Friedland and Clifton appeared skeptical of that position, asserting the risk was too abstract."

Dear Judges Friedland and Clifton,

Respectfully speaking, what can you possibly be thinking?

http://cis.org/cadman/judiciary-has-no-business-second-guessing-national-security-issues
« Last Edit: February 15, 2017, 11:53:39 am by rangerrebew »

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Re: The Judiciary Has No Business Second Guessing National Security Issues
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2017, 11:57:33 am »
It is interesting the courts didn't intercede when Roosevelt had Americans of Japanese descent put into fenced camps in WWII but get involved when Trump wants to keep terrorists out of country?  Don't tell me there isn't legal bias in the decisions of this issue.