On this issue it seems that way. I'm surprised, @Jazzhead normally has a pretty libertarian bent of mind.
Insurance is not human right and it's not the government's business. It's not an enumerated power. End of story.
As I speculated earlier, the way that different conservatives approach the ACA is likely a function of whether they believe the access issue is important or, as you suggest, they believe that affordable health insurance is "not a human right", so why should we care about folks who can't because of their health get or afford insurance? Let the hospitals pay the cost for such unfortunates and pass the cost on to the rest of us who have insurance.
But health insurance IS the government's business, whether you like it or not. The reason most of us get health insurance through our employers is a direct result of government policy, and the tax incentives created by government policy. It may well be better to deny employers a tax break for providing health insurance and let individuals deduct the cost of such insurance no matter where they get it from. But how do you manage the transition?
The ACA failed because it never seriously focused on the matter that forms part of its name - the affordability of care. The incentives created by ACA force employers and private citizens into gold-plated insurance policies that cover lots of stuff for free, other stuff that many folks don't need, and prohibit plans from setting annual or lifetime limits on benefits. Insurance meeting ACA standards is EXPENSIVE - with the result that the folks most affected by ACA are those who've either lost the policies they used to have or can maintain them only at the cost of higher deductibles and copays and skinnier provider networks.
So, yeah, a key aspect of any ACA reform must be the provision of less comprehensive and less costly choices - such as catastrophic coverage, or coverage with reasonable annual or lifetime limits like in the old days. Folks have different appetites for risk, and different abilities to self-fund those risks. While I agree conceptually that everyone should have insurance, everyone should be able to get insurance that fits their situation.