Gowdy Slams 9th Circuit Opinion: No Right For Non-Citizens To Come To US

[rangerrebew]

Gowdy Slams 9th Circuit Opinion: No Right For Non-Citizens To Come To US
Photo of Kerry Picket
Kerry Picket
Reporter
11:41 PM 02/09/2017
605
99
 

South Carolina Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, took apart the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that blocked President Donald Trump’s immigration pause Thursday night.

Gowdy said in a statement that no one should be surprised with the ruling that came from the court and that the 9th Circuit “has a well-earned reputation for being presumptively reversible. Unlike the district court order, there is at least a court opinion which can be evaluated.”

Gowdy went on to say, “Of particular interest is the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal’s suggestion that even those unlawfully present in the country have certain due process rights with respect to immigration. The Court cites Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 695 (2001) for the proposition that even aliens who have committed and been convicted of certain crimes while in the U.S. unlawfully may have due process rights with respect to travel to or from the United States. In addition, the Court ventures curiously into its own role in reviewing a President’s national security conclusions.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/09/gowdy-slams-9th-circuit-opinion-no-right-for-non-citizens-to-come-to-u-s/#ixzz4YILKLCRe

[TomSea]

Here was a real good article on Trey Gowdy with some on his background:

Trey Gowdy: Washington Watchman
By Charles Chandler   •   February 2, 2017

In the summer of 1986, freshly graduated from Baylor University, 21-year-old Trey Gowdy had no clue where his life was headed. He had a history degree, but no vision for his future. It was as if his very existence was pointless, aimless.

A native of Spartanburg, S.C., Gowdy had turned down a scholarship to the University of South Carolina’s law school and, almost as an escape, considered moving far away to Las Cruces, N.M., to join a friend’s construction business.
Subscribe to Decision

Searching for answers, he secluded himself at a friend’s western North Carolina lake home. Though he had received Christ as his Savior as a young boy, God seemed far away.

After fishing one afternoon—and catching nothing—he turned on a black-and-white television set in the den, figuring he would watch sports.

Instead, he landed on a channel with Billy Graham preaching.

He was cut to the heart and fell to his knees.

More: https://billygraham.org/decision-magazine/february-2017/trey-gowdy-washington-watchman/

[Bigun]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9BYhSQulm0&feature=youtu.be

[XenaLee]

Gowdy on video:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdbrllhI-a0

Rep. Trey Gowdy Delivers the Boom in Regards to the Court Ruling on Trump’s Travel Ban

http://theresurgent.com/rep-trey-gowdy-delivers-the-boom-in-regards-to-the-court-ruling-on-trumps-travel-ban/

[Bigun]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdbrllhI-a0

[endicom]

Congressional Republicans taking the reins? That would be good. Probably.

[skeeter]

As long as we have immigration laws, every "non-citizen" has a right to come to America...

...under the guidance of those laws.

Nonsense. Contrary to leftist dogma "rights" do not come from laws.

Why do you subscribe to leftist dogma?

[skeeter]

Word games?

The rules are clearly laid out for immigration (albeit complicated).  Any foreign can apply and go through the process.  Many will not make it.

And you claim they can't.

You said "rights", the definition of which is clearly delineated in the founding documents.

You say they have right, presumably laid out in statutory law, to come here. Thats incorrect.

[alicewonders]

Nonsense. Contrary to leftist dogma "rights" do not come from laws.

Why do you subscribe to leftist dogma?

Bears poop in the woods.....lefties spew leftist dogma.

[Wingnut]

Bears poop in the woods.....lefties spew leftist dogma.

Spot on!   

[montanajoe]

Once the US issues a visa to someone from a foreign country they aquire limited due process rights.

One of those rights would be not to have your visa cancelled with no advanced notice barring exceptional circumstances that the government must prove.

[Norm Lenhart]

Once the US issues a visa to someone from a foreign country they aquire limited due process rights.

One of those rights would be not to have your visa cancelled with no advanced notice barring exceptional circumstances that the government must prove.

I really want to see the law stating that. Or anything remotely close to it since visas/green cards can be revoked for any reason at any time. By the executive that has ALL constitutional authority to do so.

[truth_seeker]

Once the US issues a visa to someone from a foreign country they aquire limited due process rights.

One of those rights would be not to have your visa cancelled with no advanced notice barring exceptional circumstances that the government must prove.

Visas have NOT been cancelled. Reentry has been suspended, pending resolution of vetting for national security purposes.

Every President has made use of suspensions, deferrals of visas, reentry provisions, for decades.

The law cited to give "Plenary" authority to the Potus dates from 1952.  Plenary means "absolute."

[beandog]

Once the US issues a visa to someone from a foreign country they aquire limited due process rights.

One of those rights would be not to have your visa cancelled with no advanced notice barring exceptional circumstances that the government must prove.

Really.  I like to see that statute because I don't believe it.

[Bigun]

Really.  I like to see that statute because I don't believe it.

it's USC pulled it out of my @$$!

[geronl]

duh?

They should not be released pending a court hearing, for one.

[montanajoe]

Just stating law as it stands and has been interrupted by the Court.

Folks can  live in the fantasy that they know how the Courts should rule based on their preconceived notions but the Courts are and should be slow adapters, lagging the public by a generation or two.


The law and as it has has been interpreted by the SC for at least 100 years gives immigrants holding valid visa's limited due process rights. PERIOD

If trump was not such an idiot  this could and my view should have been implemented easily..but there is a vocal minority that can only see my way or the highway despite legal president..