For example, the states made a 5th Amendment "due process" argument; the court ruled that "the Government has not shown that the Executive Order provides what due process requires, such as notice and a hearing prior to restricting an individual’s ability to travel."
Due process for people in Syria? The Courts have no jurisdiction in Syria. The people involved are in Syria (and other places outside the court's jurisdiction.)
Care to try again for a non nonsensical argument?
Note that their standard here is whether the Gov't made a sufficiently strong argument to merit the stay; they did not.
And of course the Judges are too brain dead stupid to recognize there is a serious issue of "standing" and that the plain wording of the law makes it clear that the President has this authority.
No, it isn't that there are three idiots on the bench, it's that the government didn't present a good case.
It is insane that the government was expected to present a case.