U.S. military officials told Reuters that the operation was approved without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup operations.
Based on my own "limited" experience from 8+ years as an Air Defense Artillery officer, I never saw an operations order that was based on "sufficient intelligence, ground support, or adequate backup operations."
These "U.S. military officials" quoted need to resign their commissions, IMO. Where the hell were they when this operation was being orchestrated? IMO, these officers were more concerned about their careers than the success of the mission.
Being a leader demands that you speak up when the need arises. Even if things work out because you spoke up, that doesn't necessarily mean that your career will benefit. I experienced that on more than a few occasions, but I had never planned on a career anyway.
I pray that our officer corps is transformed from a group of Courtney Massengales to Sam Damons.