Author Topic: Caution, Conservative Media Critics  (Read 462 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EasyAce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,385
  • Gender: Male
  • RIP Blue, 2012-2020---my big, gentle friend.
Caution, Conservative Media Critics
« on: January 24, 2017, 04:48:36 am »
By Noah Rothman
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/politics-ideas/conservatives-republicans/caution-conservative-media-bias-critics/

Quote
Longtime conservative critics of a prevailing center-left bias in the press won a significant victory this week. In celebrating their
success, however, those same media skeptics are sacrificing the credibility they have spent years accumulating and husbanding
by coupling their fortunes with those of President Donald Trump.

Conservatives have long condemned a prevailing culture in the press in which preserving a cordial relationship between reporter
and subject seemed to be the principle objective. It has taken the inauguration of a president with whom reporters have a bitterly
hostile relationship to reinvigorate the conscience of the press. That reorientation accelerated over the weekend following a humiliating
display in which White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer and presidential advisor Kellyanne Conway promoted an insultingly thin
narrative in which Americans were asked not to believe their own eyes.

The journalistic class has been so offended by Spicer’s claim that this sparsely attended inauguration had “the largest audience” of
any prior inauguration that they implicitly conceded many of the points that conservative media critics have been making for the last
eight years. “The traditional way of reporting–digging–is back,” averred McClatchy’s Washington editor, Kristin Roberts. “It’s the lazy,
modern way that relies on handouts that might now be dead.” Roberts was remarking on a Washington Post column from media
columnist and former New York Times public editor, Margaret Sullivan, who quoted numerous journalists newly endowed with a steely
resolve to do journalistic combat with this White House.

Conservatives should welcome this new sense of mission in members of the Fourth Estate, even if the timing is more than a little
irritating. Journalists did not react with such ire when Jay Carney was insisting that he knew at least three Hilary Rosens, or when
they were being manipulated (as former Deputy NSA Ben Rhodes confessed) to sell untruths about the Iran nuclear deal to a skeptical
public.  At a moment in which the journalistic establishment is essentially conceding their point, conservative media critics are entitled
to some triumphalism. They would be better served, however, to check that impulse. Few of the right’s most strident media critics
have adjusted to their new reality.

For conservatives, an antagonistic relationship with the press is baked into their DNA. They are used to being the plucky outsiders
raging against an entrenched and closed system in Washington. During the Obama years, the powerful and the press enjoyed a
symbiotic relationship at which conservatives took regular shots. At least, that was how the right saw it. That traditional power dynamic
has been turned on its head. Conservative media critics are no longer the David in this relationship; they have a vocal ally in the
Oval Office. Standing before a memorial to those Americans who perished in U.S. clandestine operations on Saturday, Trump insisted
that he is prosecuting a “running war” with the “dishonest media.” Conservative media critics are his de facto foot soldiers in that
war. They’re the man now.

Those on the right who are taking a victory lap today cite opinion polling that shows the public has a historically low estimation of the
political press. In combination with the election of someone who is himself a media critic to the White House—a figure who won the
presidency while railing against the reporting establishment—that suggests to them that media is well and truly discredited. This is
wishful thinking. The institution of political journalism will not disappear over the course of Trump’s presidency. Indeed, there are
promising albeit early indications that the practice will enter a renaissance in the Trump era. Conservatives risk sacrificing some of
the resonance of their argument against the practice of political reporting by harnessing their movement to a presidency that has
an antagonistic relationship with the truth.

Not only is Donald Trump an unpopular president who may tarnish Republican politicians by association, but he could also compel
conservative media critics to sacrifice their credibility. Standing by the president, the left will be able to claim–with some justification–
conservative media critics’ goal isn’t the restoration of objectivity and skepticism in reporting. Precisely the opposite, in fact. They
want to ensure biased reporting benefits them and their allies. And one of those allies is the most powerful person on earth.

Over the years, conservative criticisms of the press have resonated more than those who issue those criticisms often acknowledge.
In the past, the self-evident validity of their frustration with individual acts of reportorial bias was lent moral authority by the fact
that conservatives suffered from a power imbalance. The authority of their arguments may remain intact, but their influence has
changed dramatically. If they come to be seen as handmaidens for the president, their fortunes will rise and fall with his. That
would be a tragedy not just for conservatives but for objective journalism, too.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2017, 04:48:53 am by EasyAce »


"The question of who is right is a small one, indeed, beside the question of what is right."---Albert Jay Nock.

Fake news---news you don't like or don't want to hear.