Ahh yes, what the holder of the indefensible position does: plays with words. What, pray tell, is a "constitutional majority"? A majority of the electoral college? If so, then there is no argument, that's obvious, duh. A majority of the popular vote? No. And it seems that is what you're trying to imply, which makes you a liar.
So you are stating the fact that Trump won the Presidential election is an 'indefensible' position?
I am unsure of even how to respond to something as idiotic as that.
And if you read the Constitution, you will determine that a majority of the votes cast by the Electoral College constitutes a 'constitutional majority'.
It is most decidedly not what is a majority of the popular vote. That is mentioned no where in the Constitution that decides elections.
Going through all of that plays right into the hands of those who wish to dissolve the Republican Form of Government that our Founders created by eliminating the Electoral College and is simply not even important at all on how this election was run or won.
And calling someone a bald-faced liar does not win very many arguments. No reason to reduce yourself to that type of language.