Trump’s Victory Is a Pivotal Turning Point in Human History

[Emjay]

Only to those who have been in a coma for the last 40 years. Some of his worst behavior has come during the campaign but I'm sure we're past all that now. 

I meant that, while we knew exactly what Hillary would do ... and it was all bad... Trump is still a mystery as to what he will do as president.

Nobody has to remind me about what Trump is like as a person but nobody knows what he'll do as president.

[musiclady]

@musiclady

Thanks for admitting you plan on hating him even if he turns into the best president we ever had.

Yet you LOVED Boy Jorge beyond all logical reason,and that SOB was a horrible freaking president and a traitor to his oath.

@sneakypete

I made a decision yesterday about what to do in response to your bizarre, repeated, deceitful and childish, thread-jacking taunts.

Every time you assault me with lies about lusting after George W. Bush, I will simply respond with an equally absurd accusation that you have a man-crush on him (thus, your obsession) and are simply jealous that you can't have him all to yourself.

Perhaps that will stop you from inserting your fantasy delusions on otherwise rational threads, and your pre-pubescent cyber bullying will cease.

You see, unlike you, I am both emotionally secure and honest, so, while I hate that you keep lying about me, I am not intimidated by your ad hominem idiocy, and I can be as consistent in responding to your lies as you are in perpetrating them.

I am going to continue posting my views on this forum, but if you try this crap again, I will simply respond in kind, and accuse you of the moral degradation you accuse me of repeatedly.  I'm sure you will love my calling you a degenerate as much as I do when you level that accusation at me.

If instead, you just want to stop lying, I'm good with that.

The ball is in your court, deceitful peter.......

[sneakypete]

@sneakypete

I made a decision yesterday about what to do in response to your bizarre, repeated, deceitful and childish, thread-jacking taunts.

Every time you assault me with lies about lusting after George W. Bush, I will simply respond with an equally absurd accusation that you have a man-crush on him (thus, your obsession) and are simply jealous that you can't have him all to yourself.

@musiclady

Well,that makes about as much sense and anything else you write. You and reality never have seemed to have never been within shouting distance ,so that fits right in.

[Night Hides Not]

Open memo to mods:







 

[DCPatriot]

@sneakypete

I made a decision yesterday about what to do in response to your bizarre, repeated, deceitful and childish, thread-jacking taunts.

Every time you assault me with lies about lusting after George W. Bush, I will simply respond with an equally absurd accusation that you have a man-crush on him (thus, your obsession) and are simply jealous that you can't have him all to yourself.

Perhaps that will stop you from inserting your fantasy delusions on otherwise rational threads, and your pre-pubescent cyber bullying will cease.

You see, unlike you, I am both emotionally secure and honest, so, while I hate that you keep lying about me, I am not intimidated by your ad hominem idiocy, and I can be as consistent in responding to your lies as you are in perpetrating them.

I am going to continue posting my views on this forum, but if you try this crap again, I will simply respond in kind, and accuse you of the moral degradation you accuse me of repeatedly.  I'm sure you will love my calling you a degenerate as much as I do when you level that accusation at me.

If instead, you just want to stop lying, I'm good with that.

The ball is in your court, deceitful peter.......

...thought you were leaving the thread, darling.   

[musiclady]

@musiclady

Well,that makes about as much sense and anything else you write. You and reality never have seemed to have never been within shouting distance ,so that fits right in.

If anything you wrote made sense (I suppose it does to you), then I wouldn't have to respond in kind with nonsense, now would I?   What I said is as logical as what you say repeatedly.

Again.......... cease and desist from the false accusations, and all will be well.  But the next time you lie, you can be assured as to what I will say in response.

It's a simple request, peter.  Try to see if you have the courage to control yourself.

The ball is still in your court.

And now I am done.   I hope you have a Happy New Year, and have someone you care about to celebrate it with.

[musiclady]

...thought you were leaving the thread, darling.   

I am.

Thanks for the kind reminder.

Happy New Year, friend.  ^-^

[DCPatriot]

I am.

Thanks for the kind reminder.

Happy New Year, friend.  ^-^

 

[Emjay]

I am.

Thanks for the kind reminder.

Happy New Year, friend.  ^-^

I've had Sneaky Pete on ignore ever since he made a lewd comment about me because I admire George W. Bush, a gentleman and a good president.

I would suggest you do the same ... it makes life more pleasant.

[geronl]

At least we don't have 'Hillary' for a president.

Right now, we don't know where vanity will lead Trump.  I'm not expecting him to grow up but it is possible that he will do some right things for the wrong reasons.

Yes, we ignore the 50 bad things he does and laud and bow down and lick his toes over the 1 right thing he did for the wrong reason while bashing those "Trump haters" for being foolish.

[musiclady]

I've had Sneaky Pete on ignore ever since he made a lewd comment about me because I admire George W. Bush, a gentleman and a good president.

I would suggest you do the same ... it makes life more pleasant.

Not a bad suggestion.  He's obsessed.


@Emjay  - DONE!

Here's to a more pleasant New Year, free from assault, for the both of us!   

[Emjay]

Yes, we ignore the 50 bad things he does and laud and bow down and lick his toes over the 1 right thing he did for the wrong reason while bashing those "Trump haters" for being foolish.

Get off of it!!!  I will never lick anyone's toes and you are ridiculous for making such a remark.

I see no point in letting trump hate turn you into an idiot.

[bigheadfred]

You people are freaking hilarious!

 

[HonestJohn]

It should never have been a choice between a mediocre, amoral liberal narcissist and Democratic Socialism.

The Republican party should have known better than to nominate  someone who didn't represent a single thing they stood for.

Now we area faced with the "better" of two bad options and a dismal future, all because of the desire for "hope and change" based on empty rhetoric.

The America that has saved the world in the past no longer exists.

The election of Donald J. Trump is absolute proof of that.

The GOP didn't nominate Trump, the primary candidate.  He ran and then the GOP, in a panic over another "Ross Perot" event, co-opted him into running in the GOP primary.  They thought one of their candidates would easily beat him.

That he won the GOP primary shows that the plurality of GOP primary voters WANTED him. 

And that the rest, the majority of GOP primary voters, have such radically disparate notions of conservatism that they cannot agree to support anyone other than the candidate representing their sliver of it.  For why else have 21+ primary candidates?

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

The GOP didn't nominate Trump, the primary candidate.  He ran and then the GOP, in a panic over another "Ross Perot" event, co-opted him into running in the GOP primary.  They thought one of their candidates would easily beat him in their own primary.

That he won the GOP primary shows that the plurality of GOP primary voters WANTED him. 

And that the rest, the majority of GOP primary voters, have such radically disparate notions of conservatism that they cannot agree to support anyone other than the candidate representing their sliver of it.  For why else have 21+ primary candidates?

Trump did not win a majority of primary votes, just a plurality.

[HonestJohn]

So much pessimism here ... glad I don't have my gun, I'd have to eat it.

I'm actually looking forward to seeing what Trump will do.  I was so sure Hillary would win and I knew exactly what she would do.

Trump is kind of a mystery right now.  Yes, his personal faults would challenge a whole herd of shrinks but the thing is, he might actually, accidentally get a few things right.

It's okay if you have one of these guns.

[HonestJohn]

The posts of the Trump supporters are interesting. It's like talking to a battered wife married to a lunatic, "he's really a good guy"... "he really can change"..."he didn't really mean that"...

She/they know deep down that the others are right but she/they cannot admit it to themselves because they have to much emotion invested.

The best I can hope that this lunatic doesn't get us all killed as happens to so many battered wives...

That's...

...

...a really good observation.

It really made me pause and think about it.  Thank you.  I like comments that do that.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

Trump did not win a majority of primary votes, just a plurality.

not according to the actual results.

Unsure where you are getting your information.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html?_r=0

[Cripplecreek]

Trump did not win a majority of primary votes, just a plurality.

Right around 38% till everyone else dropped out.

Reince Priebus helped Trump by allowing 17 freakin candidates when he could have easily denied some of the late entry 0 chance candidates like Graham. The GOPe didn't intend for Trump to win but they did intend for him to clear a path for someone like Bush. Trump surprised them by taking out the establishment candidates first. When they were down to 4 candidates Trump couldn't hide from serious questions anymore so he refuse further debates.

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

not according to the actual results.

Unsure where you are getting your information.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/primary-calendar-and-results.html?_r=0

Votes, not delegates.

[INVAR]

Votes, not delegates.

They have to spin the history in order to create the illusion to foment the zeitgeist that Trump was supported by the vast majority in the primary, when he never was.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

Votes, not delegates.

Votes do not select the nominee, the party does. Hence, Trump did receive a majority of delegates, which is what is important.  To suggest some type of 'popular' vote means  something plays into the libs' playbook and is a mute point anyway.

Are you adhering to some process other than that to select a nominee?

This country is not a democracy, but a Constitutional Republic.

Prager has an excellent summary of why we do not have a democracy and select by popular vote.

http://www.dennisprager.com/see-this-now-prageru-on-the-electoral-college/

[Weird Tolkienish Figure]

Votes do not select the nominee, the party does. Hence, Trump did receive a majority of delegates, which is what is important.  To suggest some type of 'popular' vote means  something plays into the libs' playbook and is a mute point anyway.

Are you adhering to some process other than that to select a nominee?

This country is not a democracy, but a Constitutional Republic.

Prager has an excellent summary of why we do not have a democracy and select by popular vote.

http://www.dennisprager.com/see-this-now-prageru-on-the-electoral-college/

 I was just mentioning that Trump never got a majority of votes, not delegates. He failed to get one in both the primary and general.

[bigheadfred]

Votes do not select the nominee, the party does. Hence, Trump did receive a majority of delegates, which is what is important.  To suggest some type of 'popular' vote means  something plays into the libs' playbook and is a mute point anyway.

Are you adhering to some process other than that to select a nominee?

This country is not a democracy, but a Constitutional Republic.

Prager has an excellent summary of why we do not have a democracy and select by popular vote.

http://www.dennisprager.com/see-this-now-prageru-on-the-electoral-college/

This country is an oligarchy.

[INVAR]

Votes do not select the nominee, the party does.

So you and the Establishment agree: no need for Primaries anymore - the Party will just select their nominee by decree.