Quix, no, this isn't a philosophical question. We are talking about real children living (or not) real lives. We need to use objectivity and reason; it's not a philosophical issue.
Perhaps we have a different definition/understanding of "philosophical."
I consider it to be a fairly dictionary definition of dealing with "ultimate realities," "ethics," "values," etc. . . . the "system of principles" definition could also apply.
I don't think of too many things besides the life and health of our children that deal more nitty-gritt-i-ly with ultimate realities and ethics.
IF The big pharma corps headed by the ruthless globalists could be TRUSTED to deal with their customers in an exceedingly ethical manner, there would likely have never been a significant problem with vaccines.
I think it's been conclusively demonstrated that Big Pharma are among the LEAST trustworthy and MOST ruthless, greedy, maniacal, genocidal tools of the globalist oligarchy. At least they are far more interested in money, greed, power than in the wholesale welfare of their customers and potential customers.
IF all the researchers could be trusted to deal in absolutely objective facts ONLY, that would have enhanced the odds of folks not being unnecessary victims of schlocky or depopulating or other evil goals of Big Pharma and their bosses.
Alas . . . IF pigs could fly . . . it would be a very different reality, indeed.