Author Topic: Obama Wants to Create More Victims of White Privilege. More phony racial “identities” -- for more racial conflict.  (Read 427 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Obama Wants to Create More Victims of White Privilege
More phony racial “identities” -- for more racial conflict.
December 14, 2016
Bruce Thornton
29
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to Facebook266Share to TwitterShare to More160Share to Print

Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

For a couple of years Obama and the U.S. Census Bureau have been working on adding to the 2020 census a new ethnic group, or “racial category.” This new addition to the conga-line of victims of white hegemony is called “Mena,” comprising people from the Middle East and North Africa, which includes very culturally diverse peoples from Berbers to Israelis, Arabs to Persians.  All sorts of soothing rationales have been put forth for this move, such as helping government and scholars “understand more about trends in health, employment and education,” as USA Today put it. But in reality the change would create even more clients for what radio hosts Larry Elder calls “Victicrats,” the Democrat Party and identity politics hustlers who gain political power and influence by claiming to champion the “people of color” victimized by “white privilege” and racial oppression.

The White House is frank about how altering the census would make this happen: impacting how the Voting Rights Act is enforced and Congressional districts are drawn; creating affirmative action plans and monitoring discrimination in housing, bank lending, and education; and identifying new recipients of government largess. That is, targeting those who would be inclined to vote Democrat once they are the beneficiaries of more government patronage. In addition, since most of these people identify as “white” on the current census, giving them a different option would support the Democrats’ narrative of a demographic shift that is reducing whites to a minority, and that will create The Coming Democrat Majority, as John Judis and Ruy Teixera called it in their 2004 book. Removing some 10 million “Menas” from the white category would confirm that thesis and comfort those still grieving over Donald Trump’s electoral refutation of that hypothesis.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265118/obama-wants-create-more-victims-white-privilege-bruce-thornton
« Last Edit: December 14, 2016, 10:29:44 pm by rangerrebew »

Offline TomSea

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40,432
  • Gender: Male
  • All deserve a trial if accused
Quote
Obama Wants to Create More Victims of White Privilege
More phony racial “identities” -- for more racial conflict.
December 14, 2016
Bruce Thornton

 For a couple of years Obama and the U.S. Census Bureau have been working on adding to the 2020 census a new ethnic group, or “racial category.” This new addition to the conga-line of victims of white hegemony is called “Mena,” comprising people from the Middle East and North Africa, which includes very culturally diverse peoples from Berbers to Israelis, Arabs to Persians.  All sorts of soothing rationales have been put forth for this move, such as helping government and scholars “understand more about trends in health, employment and education,” as USA Today put it. But in reality the change would create even more clients for what radio hosts Larry Elder calls “Victicrats,” the Democrat Party and identity politics hustlers who gain political power and influence by claiming to champion the “people of color” victimized by “white privilege” and racial oppression.

The White House is frank about how altering the census would make this happen: impacting how the Voting Rights Act is enforced and Congressional districts are drawn; creating affirmative action plans and monitoring discrimination in housing, bank lending, and education; and identifying new recipients of government largess. That is, targeting those who would be inclined to vote Democrat once they are the beneficiaries of more government patronage. In addition, since most of these people identify as “white” on the current census, giving them a different option would support the Democrats’ narrative of a demographic shift that is reducing whites to a minority, and that will create The Coming Democrat Majority, as John Judis and Ruy Teixera called it in their 2004 book. Removing some 10 million “Menas” from the white category would confirm that thesis and comfort those still grieving over Donald Trump’s electoral refutation of that hypothesis.

Continued: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/265118/obama-wants-create-more-victims-white-privilege-bruce-thornton

I first heard Medved discuss this about 10 days ago. It's wacky, creating more hyphenated Americans or more separate classes to categorize people with; but that is what is happening with a new classification "MENAS", Middle East/North African (including Iranians).

Offline goatprairie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,965
It will be interesting to see what would happen if all the people who want to see the end of white people achieve their goal. Of course, since everybody but white people are "victims," who will be the oppressors when there are no more white people  to blame for victicrat failure?
The only way Dems get people i.e. suckers to vote for them is convince them that they are victims of Evil Whitey.  Actually, male Evil Whitey.
When Evil Male Whitey is finally vanquished, the Dems will have to figure out a way to convince all their victicrat constituents that somebody is still oppressing them. How else to explain their failures and miserable lives. It certainly can't be their fault....they're never responsible for anything they do.

Offline Hondo69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,673
  • The more I know the less I understand
Don't forget the last time around.  First, they wanted to run the census right from the White House.  But after that trial balloon was shot down the radicals settled for the next best thing . . . a rigged census.

The multiple choice answers available to certain questions (especially about race) left many citizens confused by the limited options.  The design purposely forced them into a box they didn't fit.  If "none of the above" was an available choice I'm sure many would have selected that as the best option.

I'm exaggerating a bit, but it was almost as bad as:

Select your race:
  • Hispanic
  • 90% Hispanic
  • 70% Hispanic
  • 50% Hispanic