Michigan Veteran Describes Triangle UFO Hovering over I-75 {trained in estimating sizes, distances--some ~precise observations}

[Quix]

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/unexplained/michigan-veteran-describes-triangle-ufo-hovering-over-i-75

imho, he makes some way above average-in-precision observations--due to his training in how to estimate sizes and distances from his military career. There are some clear maps in the article. He traveled to directly under the craft and then on down the freeway I-75.

A Michigan military veteran at Roscommon reported watching a hovering black, triangle UFO near Camp Grayling with an odd light configuration, according to testimony in Case 80122 from the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) witness reporting database.
.
. . .
“When I was directly under the craft, the color was closer to red-orange, and blue-green. The white light that did not strobe was located on the ‘point’ of the triangle facing south, blue-green was west, red-orange was east. The alternating strobe lights were located between the dim center, white light and the two flanking lights, oriented east east-west. The corner lights also appeared to be ‘fuzzy’ or have an ‘aurora’ to them.”
.
. . .
The object was between 125 and 200 meters in altitude. (Credit: Google)
.
The witness estimated the altitude between 125-200 meters.
.
“Seeing all this made me do a double take from the shock of what was a hovering craft in a shape and configuration so unfamiliar. Approximately 100 meters past (south) of the object I lost sight of it. Followed quickly by the exit sign for Old 76 (Exit 244). As I realized what I had seen, I began taking notes of all pertinent data, including time (10:01 was when I began taking notes), size, altitude, the color and orientation of the lights as well.”
.
. . .

I think this is an above average observation/report. Dyed-in-the-wool-bone-marrow-skeptics can throw rocks at such observations if they wish--which they tend to compulsively insist on doing.

However, given the wealth of high quality observations by trained observers, I think that routine dismissal and trashing of such cases is ignorant, irrational and not well thought-out. And, I think it has more to do with the individual skeptic's psychodynamics and entrenched world view than it does with accurate observations and a fair-minded consideration of the facts.