Journalist who called for Trump assassination just got some bad news

[DCPatriot]

A writer for the Telegraph and the Guardian, Monisha Rajesh, deleted her Twitter account shortly after calling for the assassination of Donald Trump. Now it looks like Rajesh will be out of work.


breitbart.com reports: Following the election of Donald Trump this week, Rajesh posted multiple angry tweets to her now-deleted Twitter page, an archive of which can be seen here. The most notable, however, was one that Rajesh tweeted to Mark C. O’Flaherty, a photographer and travel writer who has also deleted his Twitter account, calling for “a presidential assassination.”


Breitbart reached out to both The Telegraph and The Guardian for comment on Rajesh’s tweets promoting violence against the president-elect. The official comment from the Telegraph Media Group was, “Monisha Rajesh is not an employee of Telegraph Media Group and will not be commissioned on a freelance basis.”

more at:  http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=48706   or   http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/11/11/columnist-deletes-twitter-account-following-trump-assassination-tweet/

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[Frank Cannon]

It's about time someone pull these Leftist idiots ticket.

[DiogenesLamp]

1 left-wing kook "Journalist" down,   about 5,000 more to go. 


They all need to be put out of work.   Conservatives need to take over the news networks.   We will not get fair coverage until this happens. 

[r9etb]

Conservatives need to take over the news networks.   We will not get fair coverage until this happens.

I'd just as soon have a media corps who hates everybody equally, thank you very much.

[Norm Lenhart]

It's about time someone pull these Leftist idiots ticket.

She will be hired shortly elsewhere. She should be in jail.

[Norm Lenhart]

I'd just as soon have a media corps who hates everybody equally, thank you very much.

[ABX]

These people are idiots.

I said the same thing about Obama- no matter what you think of the man, an attack on him is an attack on the office he holds, and thus an attack on our Constitutional government.

[DiogenesLamp]

I'd just as soon have a media corps who hates everybody equally, thank you very much.

We've had 60 years of left wing Television coverage.   So okay.   Give us 60 years of right wing coverage,  we'll call it even,  then we can go back to balanced.  How's that?   

[r9etb]

We've had 60 years of left wing Television coverage.   So okay.   Give us 60 years of right wing coverage,  we'll call it even,  then we can go back to balanced.  How's that?   

Argument against:

[DCPatriot]

1 left-wing kook "Journalist" down,   about 5,000 more to go. 


They all need to be put out of work.   Conservatives need to take over the news networks.   We will not get fair coverage until this happens.

re: bold

While I totally agree with the premise, it's even typing that....that wil be held up as an example to feed even @INVAR 's fears.

Expose deceit.  Demand their removal from the air and the internet in that occupation.   Become a blogger.  GTFO.

There have to be THOUSANDS of people in the media that secretly supported Trump, while not even voting for him.   It's about their survival.

But if these cretins can be thrown out and exposed, maybe others would stand up with, "I'm Spartacus!"
 

[DCPatriot]

These people are idiots.

I said the same thing about Obama- no matter what you think of the man, an attack on him is an attack on the office he holds, and thus an attack on our Constitutional government.

That's really not the point.

He's the President-elect.   It's the same as wishing it on Obama...in the eyes of the Secret Service.

[Norm Lenhart]

We've had 60 years of left wing Television coverage.   So okay.   Give us 60 years of right wing coverage,  we'll call it even,  then we can go back to balanced.  How's that?   

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. One echo chamber does not improve on another. You would be right back to a very bad situation within months.

[ABX]

That's really not the point.

He's the President-elect.   It's the same as wishing it on Obama...in the eyes of the Secret Service.

I probably didn't word it right but that's pretty much what I meant, IE, I agree with you.

[240B]

I just posted about this 5 minutes ago on the Grubhub thread.


Liberals cannot seem to comprehend that what they say has immediate and sever consequences. They live in such a cloistered echo chamber that they automatically assume that every 'reasonable' person agrees with them. They do not seem to understand that there are different opinions which are equal in validity to theirs.


Hubris, intolerance, and arrogance is the definition of being "Liberal".

[INVAR]

re: bold

While I totally agree with the premise, it's even typing that....that wil be held up as an example to feed even @INVAR 's fears.

And that is because history teaches that it doesn't matter if it is a Communist or a Fascist 'revolution' - one of the first things taken over on the imposition of tyranny - (even a mob-supported one) , is purging the media and it's former journalists and editors.  Mass executions are pretty common.

Read up on the Munich Post if you dare.

That idiots pretending to be Conservative Constitutionalists are advocating what the enemies of liberty advocate - then I submit they are as equally reprehensible and dangerous to the existence of liberty as from the Leftists they so hate.

Because out of fear of the Communists, the mobs sought refuge and retribution from strong demagogues last century.

Their nation's ended up smoking hulks of ruin because the masses believed their leaders would make them 'great again', and they applauded and approved of the same garbage some would be happy to applaud and approve today.

[Norm Lenhart]

I just posted about this 5 minutes ago on the Grubhub thread.


Liberals cannot seem to comprehend that what they say has immediate and sever consequences. They live in such a cloistered echo chamber that they automatically assume that every 'reasonable' person agrees with them. They do not seem to understand that there are different opinions which are equal in validity to theirs.


Hubris, intolerance, and arrogance is the definition of being "Liberal".

They got away with making a movie about Killing GWB and I bet that paper reviewed it and gave it glowing reviews. This woman had no reasonable expectation she would suffer any consequence.

[Norm Lenhart]

And that is because history teaches that it doesn't matter if it is a Communist or a Fascist 'revolution' - one of the first things taken over on the imposition of tyranny - (even a mob-supported one) , is purging the media and it's former journalists and editors.  Mass executions are pretty common.

Now Invar, you know full well that only happened because the right people were not in charge...

[r9etb]

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. One echo chamber does not improve on another. You would be right back to a very bad situation within months.

TOS being the case in point, as all of us here are well aware.

[dfwgator]

These people are idiots.

I said the same thing about Obama- no matter what you think of the man, an attack on him is an attack on the office he holds, and thus an attack on our Constitutional government.

Besides, the last thing we want is for Obama to become a martyr for the Left.

[flowers]

I just posted about this 5 minutes ago on the Grubhub thread.


Liberals cannot seem to comprehend that what they say has immediate and sever consequences. They live in such a cloistered echo chamber that they automatically assume that every 'reasonable' person agrees with them. They do not seem to understand that there are different opinions which are equal in validity to theirs.


Hubris, intolerance, and arrogance is the definition of being "Liberal".

   @240B  that stock is down 4.9% since he did that.

[Norm Lenhart]

TOS being the case in point, as all of us here are well aware.

Very good case in point actually. Complete with purging and demands for outright ideological purity.

[240B]

They got away with making a movie about Killing GWB and I bet that paper reviewed it and gave it glowing reviews. This woman had no reasonable expectation she would suffer any consequence.

I wonder if Brexit and Trump are harbingers of change in that regard.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7qQ6_RV4VQ

[DiogenesLamp]

Argument against:

You're gonna have to do better than that.   That's just one guy.   How many do they have?  30? 50? 100?   And that's just the talking heads.   How many editors,  programmers,  cameramen,  writers,  janitors,  etc.  in the studio that are left wing Democrat hacks?   


Virtually all of them.   

[dfwgator]

I wonder if Brexit and Trump are harbingers of change in that regard.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7qQ6_RV4VQ

Or "The Times They Are a Changin' Back."

[r9etb]

Hubris, intolerance, and arrogance is the definition of being "Liberal".

It's not a distinctively "Liberal" failing, though.  I've seen those things from people of all political persuasions.  Leftist activists have gained power, so their hubris, intolerance, and arrogance have larger consequences at the moment.  Perhaps their tendency toward magical thinking makes it seem worse.  But it really is not just them.