I agree with the article's argument.
My thoughts:
- No "early voting". Election Day is "election day". Show up and vote - you snooze, you lose.
- No "absentee ballots", with VERY few exceptions (such as active duty service members, hospitalized and infirm persons, etc.). Again, show up and vote, or else.
- No "mail in" ballots. No "mail in" elections. Show up on election day and vote.
- No "provisional ballots" of any kind. If you haven't taken the time to register (in advance), tough luck.
- No totally-electronic balloting. ALL votes must be made on paper ballots (using a machine to tally results is OK). ALL voting machines must issue a printed receipt to the voter (if requested) showing all ballot choices as tallied by the machine.
- No "motor voter" or "automatic" registration. If you want to be a registered voter, show up at city hall with proper documentation at least four months in advance of the election. Otherwise -- too bad.
- No reporting of vote tallies until two hours after ALL voting districts (in the state) have closed. No more "Philadelphias" that can manufacture additional votes when it's realized the state tally is running against the democrats. ALL district results will remain sealed and opened at one time. If this means election results aren't known until the next day, so be it.
Does this sound "discriminatory" to you?
I hope so. It's intended to be.
And necessary to preserve the integrity of the electoral process.
All the "progressive improvements" of the past 20 years are designed to subvert that integrity...