HILLARY'S CASTRO ENDORSEMENT When Stalinist monsters bestow their blessing.

[TomSea]

HILLARY'S CASTRO ENDORSEMENT
When Stalinist monsters bestow their blessing.
November 3, 2016  Humberto Fontova 

“It’s Hillary’s hour!...The only hope of defeating Donald Trump is Hillary Clinton…the difference between the two candidates is vast. Barack Obama did not exaggerate when he claimed that she was better prepared to be a U.S. President than even he was—or was her husband Bill Clinton.” (Stalinist Cuba’s KGB-founded and mentored media organ Cubadebate, Oct. 15, 2016.)

There was a day when winning a ringing endorsement from communist mass-murdering, terror -sponsors who craved (and came within a whisker) of nuking your nation would NOT be considered an asset for a U.S. Presidential candidate.

“In any nation of the world–and even in the U.S. during normal times–Donald Trump would find himself either in prison or in a mental institution!”

There was a day when being threatened with prison and torture (even figuratively) by an enemy Stalinist regime that jailed and tortured political prisoners (many of them U.S. citizens) at a higher rate than Stalin during the Great Terror would be considered an enormous asset for a U.S. Presidential candidate. 

But the ringing communist endorsement for Hillary Clinton gets even “better:”

Continued: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264684/hillarys-castro-endorsement-humberto-fontova

[Oceander]

Meh.  Clinton has the Castros, Trump has Putin.  Evil is evil is evil, and evil by any other name would smell as foetid. 

[corbe]

  Hillary certainly has the 'Castro' Vote locked up
    San Antonio 'la raza', Communist Twins

[Steve_Seattle]

Any endorsement of Trump by a dubious individual or group is instantly reported by the MSM.  Not so much with Hillary.  The MSM will typically spike any potentially embarrassing Hillary endorsements (Communist Party USA, Castro), even as they publicize the dubious utterances of unknown Trump supporters and try to make them the face of the campaign.  The other day, the NYT had a story on pro-Trump "militias" who are motivated by Hillary's opposition to the 2nd Amendment.  No time was spent in examining whether the fears of the "militia" people had any basis in reality (they do), and the tone of the story was to suggest that a Hillary victory (or a Trump victory?) would lead to widespread, violent insurrection. 

[Oceander]

Any endorsement of Trump by a dubious individual or group is instantly reported by the MSM.  Not so much with Hillary.  The MSM will typically spike any potentially embarrassing Hillary endorsements (Communist Party USA, Castro), even as they publicize the dubious utterances of unknown Trump supporters and try to make them the face of the campaign.  The other day, the NYT had a story on pro-Trump "militias" who are motivated by Hillary's opposition to the 2nd Amendment.  No time was spent in examining whether the fears of the "militia" people had any basis in reality (they do), and the tone of the story was to suggest that a Hillary victory (or a Trump victory?) would lead to widespread, violent insurrection. 

And Trump has done everything possible to validate the aspersions being cast by the MSM.