Newt Gingrich full explosive interview with Sean Hannity (10/31/2016)

[HAPPY2BME]

Published on Oct 31, 2016


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0DpJLhPk1o


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0DpJLhPk1o

[HAPPY2BME]

Barack Obama is implicated in MORE THAN ONE CASE as a felon.

Huma may be testifying both against Hillary Clinton AND Barack Obama.

[HAPPY2BME]

What Frank Cannon and the #NeverTrumper$ will have to say about this ..

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-disqualified/

[HAPPY2BME]

18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071

[Lando Lincoln]

A personal note fwiw, which is close to nothing I suppose:

I hate the shouting headline.

[skeeter]

I'll wait until Gingrich gives the same interview to someone else, thanks.

[driftdiver]

+1 - I think the forum software should be changed to prevent such articles from being posted.

That would cut out about 50% of the OPs threads then.   

[Hoodat]

NEWT GINGRICH FULL EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW

The Wilsonian Progressive chimes in.

[Night Hides Not]

That would cut out about 50% of the OPs threads then.

 

[Hoodat]

What Frank Cannon and the #NeverTrumper$ will have to say about this ..

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-disqualified/

They will say that HAPPY2BME is linking to liberal websites.

[Night Hides Not]

The Wilsonian Progressive chimes in.

aka "Trumpian Conservative"

Did you hear the latest joke about Trump and Hillary?

There isn't one...the joke's on us.

[Night Hides Not]

They will say that HAPPY2BME is linking to liberal websites.

And "they" would be largely correct in their assessment. Just my $.02, of course.

[Longmire]

Hannity should not talk so much, especially with someone like Gingrich who knows how to explain things.

Good interview though and worth watching.

-btw I especially like the headline being all caps, makes it easier to find in the queue.

[HAPPY2BME]

-btw I especially like the headline being all caps, makes it easier to find in the queue.

==========================

Yeah, it really kicks the llama's ass ..

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,232413.msg1119439.html#msg1119439

[Frank Cannon]

Hannity should not talk so much,

Probably be better to not talk at all.

[skeeter]

Hannity should not talk so much, especially with someone like Gingrich who knows how to explain things.

Hannity should not talk so much because Hannity is incapable of an original thought.

[Sanguine]

What Frank Cannon and the #NeverTrumper$ will have to say about this ..

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-disqualified/

I want to make sure I understand your point: you are using a premise that Snopes discredits to discredit HRC?  In addition to using Snopes at all?  Or, maybe you're using some kind of reverse reasoning?

[HAPPY2BME]

I want to make sure I understand your point: you are using a premise that Snopes discredits to discredit HRC?  In addition to using Snopes at all?  Or, maybe you're using some kind of reverse reasoning?

==============================

FC (&CO.) constantly refer to snopes.com as their 'FACT-CHECKER.'

snopes.com is a propaganda front for the democrat party (Hillary Clinton)

[Sanguine]

==============================

FC (&CO.) constantly refer to snopes.com as their 'FACT-CHECKER.'

snopes.com is a propaganda front for the democrat party (Hillary Clinton)

So, your answer to my question is what?

[Longmire]

snopes.com is a propaganda front for the democrat party (Hillary Clinton)

That's worth repeating...

[rodamala]

How did Newt get through TSA's Body Scanner at the airport with all that EXPLOSIVE?

[corbe]

    Thought this an appropriate place to put this.

POLITICO: And so you think he might run again in 2020?

“I think that’s very possible,” Gingrich responded. “I think he likes being part of a movement — he likes thinking of it as a movement. … I was thinking about this, [and] he said to me the other morning, … ‘I sent out one tweet and 15,000 people showed up.’”

POLITICO asked: So you’re predicting a Trump-Clinton rematch?

Gingrich: “Could be, assuming she survives.”

What do you mean “survives”?

“That she’s not impeached and convicted,” Gingrich replied. “Look … when people have time to actually digest WikiLeaks and some brave person puts together a book and goes, ‘This, this, this, this, this,’ it’s very hard to imagine how there’s not going to be some serious effort in the first year of her presidency.”

    Linkee Thingee

http://theresurgent.com/newt-gingrich-suggests-a-2020-trump-clinton-rematch-please-kill-me-now/


   

[Silver Pines]

==========================

Yeah, it really kicks the llama's ass ..

http://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,232413.msg1119439.html#msg1119439

@HAPPY2BME


You know, I've noticed a really bizarre thing (so 2016, I know).  You Trump supporters have spent months castigating, cursing, and cajoling the rest of us to try and get us to back Trump.  Then, when someone finally does, you respond...with more vitriol.

It's really one of the strangest damned things I've seen.  But we know what the issue is, right?   A vote isn't enough.  You demand absolute, groveling, slobbering fealty to the imbecile.

[Machiavelli]

A personal note fwiw, which is close to nothing I suppose:

I hate the shouting headline.

@Lando Lincoln

So do I, and I fixed it. 

[Machiavelli]

Every day Newt and Sean would come out of work together and look for their car. But all the cars in the lot looked the same, so they sat around until all the cars were gone and then they would get in the last car and go home. Newt said to Sean, ''We need to find a faster way to get home.'' So the next day they went to work on a camel. After work they came out and the parking lot was full of camels. So the Newt went around lifting up the tails of all the camels. Sean said, ''What are you doing?'' Newt said, ''When we came in today I heard someone yell "'Look at those two assholes on that camel!'"

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/jokes/two-blondes-and-a-camel/315297/